Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shoit Neh Pig

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. SNOW... Tone 12:39, 27 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Shoit Neh Pig

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contested PROD. Earwig's findings are absolutely no assertion of notability, and there is nothing at all on Google, and his opinion is that this is a hoax as well. ArcAngel (talk) 05:44, 26 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

(Ec, about to nominate.) A PROD contested by its author, my original reasoning was, "Absolutely no assertion of notability, and there is nothing at all on Google, which leaves me to believe this is a hoax as well." I stand by this reasoning. It might have been possible to delete under CSD G3 (blatant hoaxes and vandalism), but it isn't immediately apparent from reading the article that this is a hoax, so I have decided to go with an AfD. The Earwig (Talk | Contribs) 05:48, 26 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Snow delete per WP:HOAX or WP:NEO or WP:V or WP:N, etc. No evidence of notability or indeed even of its existence. Tim Song (talk) 05:53, 26 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, per Tim Song, Lord Spongefrog, (I am the Czar of all Russias!) 10:32, 26 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - probable WP:HOAX and WP:NFT, certainly fails WP:V and WP:N. JohnCD (talk) 15:16, 26 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - fails WP:MADEUP. Robofish (talk) 01:40, 27 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - the author, Daniel2147 (talk · contribs) tried to use a {{hangon}} on the page, which I removed, and left the following on the talk page, which I am quoting verbatim:

“

Dear Wiki, I know that this sounds a bit fishy and somewhat random, but it is a way people of Australia great one and another. If you were to remove the ban, I would continue to update it and make it worth the read.

Yours Sincerely Daniel2147 A Happy Wikipedian

”

Needless to say, I am not convinced. Tim Song (talk) 05:55, 27 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.