Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shuttling

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 07:46, 26 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Shuttling

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The concept is insufficiently notable for an article. Three-sentence stub with no sources and no obvious way of expanding. Brilliantine (talk) 14:31, 17 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Since it's unreferenced, just redirect to Shuttle. Polarpanda (talk) 17:12, 17 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Seems to be about one particular part of a dot matrix printer. I don't think Wikipedia needs an article on one part of the mechanism of a printer. A redirect to shuttle (disambiguation page) would not hurt. •••Life of Riley (T–C) 05:03, 18 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Tim Song (talk) 04:51, 24 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete We have the topic covered better at dot matrix printer, the article's title is not especially used for this topic and there is no significant content to lose. Colonel Warden (talk) 15:04, 25 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.