Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Skin Two

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Cirt (talk) 05:18, 30 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Skin Two

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I can't find significant coverage for this magazine. Joe Chill (talk) 05:13, 21 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. There is, however, significant coverage for the company's clothing line and events. - Eastmain (talk) 05:57, 21 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep some third party coverage [1]. LibStar (talk) 06:52, 21 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Timotheus Canens (talk) 00:30, 28 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Multiple references in books published by mainstream publishers: see http://books.google.com/books?lr=&as_brr=0&q=%22Skin+Two+magazine%22 -- The Anome (talk) 16:01, 28 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.