Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Strategic Management Process

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.‎

The result was redirect to Strategic management. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:42, 25 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Strategic Management Process

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article is simply a shortened version of Strategic Management. ^{Atsme📞📧} 17:52, 18 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Per nom. It doesn't seem like there would be anything to merge, and the title would not make a suitable redirect. --George AKA Caliburn · (Talk · Contribs · CentralAuth · Log) 18:12, 18 July 2017 (UTC) Redirect per Neutrality. --George AKA Caliburn · (Talk · Contribs · CentralAuth · Log) 19:15, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete no mergable content. Cheers, FriyMan ^{Per aspera ad astra} 20:35, 18 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect - plausible search term, and title is surely a suitable redirect; "strategic management process" phrase is used in business textbooks easily found on Google books (example 1 (7 uses of exact phrase); example 2 (20 uses of exact phrase); example 3 (18 uses of exact phrase). Neutrality^talk 19:02, 19 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect Neutrality has got a point here. Cheers, FriyMan ^{Per aspera ad astra} 17:20, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Merge into Strategic Management I think what is going on here is something that happens often in the IT and business world, some methodology has taken a generic term and has claimed ownership of it. A similar example is Rapid Application Development, it's both a generic term and the name of a specific James Martin methodology. So the article for Strategic Management Process is not really about the Strategic Management Process in general but rather a specific approach called ASP (or also called SMP). (Just to be clear, I'm not a strategy expert, I'm just going off of my interpretation of the two articles but I'm pretty sure I'm correct) I think what should happen is the content in the Strategic Management Process article should be added as one of the Concepts and Frameworks described in section 3 of the Strategic Management article. --MadScientistX11 (talk) 23:59, 24 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.