Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tau Alpha Upsilon

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 03:34, 25 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Tau Alpha Upsilon

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I restored this as a contested prod per a request at WP:REFUND, but in searching for sources to add to meet WP:Notability, I'm striking out. Gnews has 10 hits, all of which are passing mentions. The first several pages of ghits are passing mentions; gbooks has directory entries. The editor who requested the restoration at Wikipedia:Requests_for_undeletion/Current_requests#Tau_Alpha_Upsilon admits that sources may not be available. Fabrictramp | talk to me 18:58, 11 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 18:59, 11 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 19:00, 11 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fraternity at a single college. Nothing notable asserted. When references can't be found, I consider these probably suitable for AfD A7, though coming here never hurts. DGG ( talk ) 04:16, 12 December 2009 (UTC) .[reply]

Sources are in fact available under the University web page, and under their records. (SUNY Binghamton). —Preceding unsigned comment added by 149.125.174.144 (talk) 04:39, 13 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Tim Song (talk) 03:34, 18 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. No significant coverage in any reliable sources. The few press items listed on their website are coverage of events the fraternity was associated with, mentioning the group itself only in passing. --RL0919 (talk) 03:47, 21 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.