Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Team killer

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Article content afoul of the no original research policy. --Aarktica 23:31, 18 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Team killer

Completely original research. Talk page discussion concludes that there are no reliable sources for this concept. BirgitteSB 17:20, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete if any of it can be reliably sourced (and at present, none of it is), the right place for it would be the Player killer article. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 18:08, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Very common term in Counter-Strike in particular, and its a very popular game. What has been written is actually factually correct, and whilst it does contain elements of OR all this says is that the article needs to be copy edited and citations found. Operating 15:18, 11 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Merge if possible, otherwise Delete. Jtrainor 22:56, 11 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Though no sources its an extremly common term and happens frequently. With sorces it could defintly be a decent article ForeverDEAD 01:07, 12 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Sounds like WP:NEO. I would merge. --Endless Dan 22:17, 12 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. I first came across the term in 1999 whilst playing CS. Operating 04:53, 13 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Keep. I got here from reading the article on griefers; while both aren't written very well (I'd like to think the gamers who write these articles are not writing as well as they are capable of), I think this article is valuable for the lay person trying to get a better understanding of online play and its terminology. --216.9.250.104 01:42, 15 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Query It sounds like this belongs in Wiktionary? Is there a page on it there? GRBerry 14:56, 18 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.