Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Trading Post Magazine
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete. Keeper | 76 17:08, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Trading Post Magazine (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
This article does not clearly indicate the notability of the subject. I can't find non-trivial sources on the publication, and I don't think it meets notability guidelines. Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 11:29, 17 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- I have edited the article and removed specific parts that sound like an advertisement. I also removed some text that will make the article be more neutral in manner. sepepper 6:25pm (EST) January 19, 2008
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, --Bongwarrior (talk) 00:57, 23 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Any more suggestions are welcomed. I will also edit the article in the future should any more prudent information come to my attention about it. sepepper 6:15pm, 23 January 2008 (EST)
- Delete. Parts read like a copyvio or spam. Does not assert notability. If it is notable, starting from scratch would likely result in a better article that what you would get from modifying the current one. Vegaswikian (talk) 01:16, 27 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Stubify and start over. Likely notable due to lawsuits involving Google. Looks like copyvio from here. Hobit (talk) 01:29, 29 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- If you want to start over, why not start from a clean slate by deleting? Vegaswikian (talk) 03:27, 31 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Article contains no assertions of notability that are verified by reliable, third-party published sources. — Satori Son 16:14, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.