Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Unity MacLean
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 00:09, 29 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Unity MacLean (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Delete. Non-notable office manager. No stand-alone notability. COI/self-promotion issues. Article is entirely written by the subject (Unitymac) [1], and her son (Lmaclean111) [2]. WP is not a resume service. SteamboatBilly (talk) 16:52, 20 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Completely agree with nomination. Chris (talk) 17:11, 20 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:58, 21 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:01, 27 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I really can't see anything that would give this person a claim to be included in an encyclopedia. She had a cool job and I'm sure she'd be fun to have a chat with, but that isn't enough to get into an encyclopedia. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 04:07, 27 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.