Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vendesign
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 01:21, 15 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Vendesign (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
nn promotional advert only Chris (クリス • フィッチ) (talk) 12:00, 6 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions.
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.
- Delete per nomination. This business makes candy vending machines. Obvious advertising: increasing customer satisfaction and reducing service calls and maintenance. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 14:24, 6 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. The subject of this article is a notable international vending machine manufacturing company. They have received excellent reviews indicating that they are one of the higher-rated manufacturers in operation. They have also pursued and received patents for specialized technology not previously available in manufacturing. Yes, the article is poorly written and lacks references. It would be advantageous to tag the article appropriately to address tone and prompt the need for references and copy editing. Cindamuse (talk) 22:49, 6 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- And where are those sources to be found? Uncle G (talk) 23:59, 6 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Reply. Just run a google search. You'll find plenty of technical and industrial information, but if you take the time to check out the information, you will find that the sources are available and can be referenced if someone wants to do the work. Tag the article appropriately and the editor that just added the article will most likely step forward and do the work. I'm not here to add citations to each article nominated for deletion, but to offer recommendations as to whether or not sources can possibly be found to support inclusion on Wikipedia. Cindamuse (talk) 00:18, 7 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- You aren't showing any evidence that your recommendations aren't simply plucked out of thin air. You claim that sources are to be found. So, once again: Where? What is your basis for that claim? What did you do in order to arrive at that conclusion (presuming that you didn't just pluck it out of thin air)? Uncle G (talk) 00:44, 7 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Same answer. Who, what, where, why? I see their vending machines in almost every business I frequent, so I ran an effective search on google. Try it. Cindamuse (talk) 00:51, 7 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Actually, that isn't the same answer. This is the first time that you've even mentioned doing anything yourself, for instance. But you still haven't told us what your search turned up. Getting a decent keep rationale, founded in deletion policy, from you should not be like trying to pull teeth. Tell us what you did and what you found, up front. Uncle G (talk) 08:06, 9 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Same answer. Who, what, where, why? I see their vending machines in almost every business I frequent, so I ran an effective search on google. Try it. Cindamuse (talk) 00:51, 7 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- You aren't showing any evidence that your recommendations aren't simply plucked out of thin air. You claim that sources are to be found. So, once again: Where? What is your basis for that claim? What did you do in order to arrive at that conclusion (presuming that you didn't just pluck it out of thin air)? Uncle G (talk) 00:44, 7 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Reply. Just run a google search. You'll find plenty of technical and industrial information, but if you take the time to check out the information, you will find that the sources are available and can be referenced if someone wants to do the work. Tag the article appropriately and the editor that just added the article will most likely step forward and do the work. I'm not here to add citations to each article nominated for deletion, but to offer recommendations as to whether or not sources can possibly be found to support inclusion on Wikipedia. Cindamuse (talk) 00:18, 7 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- And where are those sources to be found? Uncle G (talk) 23:59, 6 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:57, 13 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Can't find singnificant coverage in independent reliable sources, WP:GNG Chzz ► 05:20, 13 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, I searched on google, gnews, gscholar, gbooks and could find no significant coverage of this company in reliable sources. There were lots of mentions, but I can see no significant coverage.--BelovedFreak 23:44, 13 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.