Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/VkTrace

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Sandstein 21:18, 17 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

VkTrace

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Nominating at AfD after this article was deproded. Fails WP:NSOFT; only coverage beyond a trivial mention is this piece and even that isn't SIGCOV. Not worth mentioning in LunarG or Vulkan (API). Helpful Raccoon (talk) 02:58, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Computing and Software. Helpful Raccoon (talk) 02:58, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: can't find WP:SIGCOV. Schützenpanzer (Talk) 19:25, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: I have added sources to demonstrate its notability.Clenpr (talk) 18:19, 12 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Clenpr The scholarly sources only contain trivial mentions of VkTrace, not significant coverage. Phoronix contains three sentences, which isn't significant either. Helpful Raccoon (talk) 21:36, 12 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

And this source was created by LunarG, so it's not independent. Helpful Raccoon (talk) 21:38, 12 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete – Per nom and the response directly above this vote. Yue🌙 20:31, 15 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.