Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Volopt
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. v/r - TP 04:24, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Volopt (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
non notable web portal/search engine. All non reliable sources except wired. Wired does not mention volopt Gaijin42 (talk) 22:40, 30 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:52, 30 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - No coverage in reliable sources, and the article is spammy too. -- Whpq (talk) 16:06, 1 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. No coverage from reliable sources. • Gene93k (talk) 19:04, 1 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you everybody for your notes The website is newly born, how can we still inform about its existence without violating Wikipedia's rules? please advice to edit accordingly, thank you Ghoroob (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 19:08, 1 December 2011 (UTC).[reply]
- Reply - Wikipedia is an online encyclopedia, and not a means for promoting your site. If there is no significant coverage about Volopt in multiple independent reliable sources to meet Wikipedia's inclusion guidelines, there there should not be an article on Volopt in Wikipedia. -- Whpq (talk) 19:26, 1 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.