Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/WebHat CMS

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. \ Backslash Forwardslash / {talk} 13:32, 5 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

WebHat CMS

contested prod. Not seeing how this product is notable, Article reads like an advert. RadioFan (talk) 13:08, 28 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: I cannot find any review of this product on the review sites, although I can see it in use in quite a few sites. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Elen of the Roads (talk • contribs)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 14:14, 28 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, like Elen of the Roads, I cannot find any sources that provide notability to this product. Thryduulf (talk) 15:29, 28 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, software not notable. Not used that much.Lourie Pieterse 16:06, 30 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I'm the author of this article; I've read carefully Sitecore page on Wikipedia before writing this article and honestly i do not see many differences. What should I do to prevent wikipedia admin from delating it? Remove the company profile I bet it is not enough. Why sitecore is still on with no risk of cancellation? Thank you for your info. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Giaguara (talk • contribs) 16:34, 30 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The key difference is that the Sitecore article is backed up with reliable sources that verify the information in the article and demonstrate its notabilty. Do note however that just because other articles exist any other similar article automatically should. Additionally, if you feel that any other article does not meet Wikipedia's policies and guidelines you are free to nominate it for deletion - see Wikipedia:Deletion for a guide. Thryduulf (talk) 18:09, 30 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.