Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wikipediism
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Singularity 05:59, 5 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Wikipediism (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
The phrase is an obvious neologism. A would not even spell this word that way, if it was a word at all.Aiden Fisher (talk) 07:15, 31 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as per nom. BWH76 (talk) 07:45, 31 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, I cannot find any sources for this supposed belief system. --Pixelface (talk) 07:46, 31 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom; only two Google results for the word. --McGeddon (talk) 07:56, 31 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as per said above. Unknown User (talk) 08:28, 31 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Agree with other statements. Doctor Will Thompson (talk) 08:59, 31 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Does not pass WP:NEO, and the only two ghits are informal references to the term. And while there's more results for the word "Wikipedism", again, there's no official reports of it. --JamieS93 13:05, 31 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. Maxamegalon2000 16:18, 31 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
comment. Kids playing. A similar 'article' was deleted the other week. Don't know if the culprits are the same.special, random, Merkinsmum 23:59, 31 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete and break out the snow shovel. This is a pretty clear-cut case of a non-notable neologism. Bfigura (talk) 00:21, 1 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Parody of Church of Google. Zero Kitsune (talk) 00:25, 1 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete religioncruft. JuJube (talk) 01:43, 1 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per all of the above. KleenupKrew (talk) 22:31, 3 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: Fails WP:N. Otolemur crassicaudatus (talk) 20:24, 4 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.