Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wild Rice Reader

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 06:16, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Wild Rice Reader

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contested PROD. Non-notable publication. I'd nominate for speedy deletion (no claim of significance or importance), but I don't think publications apply. Steamroller Assault (talk) 22:52, 29 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of News-related deletion discussions. —Steamroller Assault (talk) 02:17, 30 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - a newspaper that is asserted to be distributed to 200 businesses in Ada, Minnesota isn't notable. And there's no coverage about the newspaper. For that matter, I can't even find an online presence for it. -- Whpq (talk) 17:39, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Timotheus Canens (talk) 01:46, 5 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete more of a business newsletter than anything. No coverage of it at all. ~ DC (Talk|Edits) 02:00, 5 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete the distribution of 200 affirms total non-notability, and the article doesn't even include the barest facts (who distributes it, what's the content, why does it exist?) Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 15:30, 5 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.