Wikipedia:Copyright problems/2025 May 3
Appearance
- Manshead CE Academy (history · last edit · rewrite) from https://www.facebook.com/bedspolice/posts/1121072743400272. Stickymatch 13:32, 3 May 2025 (UTC)
Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. Sennecaster (Chat) 19:50, 23 August 2025 (UTC)
- Oswald Mosley (history · last edit · rewrite) from https://escholarship.org/content/qt99w0p17j/qt99w0p17j.pdf?t=ppzxy7. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 14:48, 3 May 2025 (UTC)
Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 18:18, 17 May 2025 (UTC)
- 2012 Dual Universal Suffrage (Hong Kong) (history · last edit · rewrite) Earwig is really unhappy about stuff pulled from https://www.legco.gov.hk/yr06-07/english/panels/ca/papers/ca0716-gppr200707-e.pdf. This is my first time listing stuff here; @Moneytrees and Sennecaster: how badly did I mess up this listing? Thanks :) HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 21:11, 3 May 2025 (UTC)
- Other than adding the "Subst:copyvio" template, no issues @HouseBlaster : ))) Moneytrees🏝️(Talk) 00:57, 4 May 2025 (UTC)
- @Dbeef has forwarded this to some zhwiki folks experienced in copyright since this is getting messy Sennecaster (Chat) 21:23, 5 October 2025 (UTC)
- Hello, thanks for @Dbeef 's invitation and I am sorry for the late response.
- Regarding the diff in question, Most of the text is from Hong Kong Basic Law, and a few parts are from Standing Committee of the National People’s Congress Interpretation of Basic Law Annex I and Annex II, and Sino-British Joint Declaration.
- According to the copyright law of China, "
this Law shall not be applicable to: (1) laws, regulations, resolutions, decisions and orders of state organs; other documents of legislative, administrative or judicial nature; and their official translations
". The Hong Kong Basic Law and the Standing Committee of the National People’s Congress Interpretation are Chinese national law and decisions of state organs, respectively, so they are not protected by copyright law. The Sino-British Joint Declaration and also the other two are edicts of a government and are in the public domain in the US per {{PD-EdictGov}}. - I am not sure if these texts are official translations, since I couldn't find some of them in the green paper published by the government or in the essay, e.g. Annex I, Article 7 and Annex II, Article 3.
- SCP-2000 08:12, 6 December 2025 (UTC)