The following discussions are requested to have community-wide attention:
You can sign up to receive a user talk page invitation to participate in discussions of interest to you, see Wikipedia:Feedback request service
Should the comparison that Herb Keinon made of the proposed renaming of the park to the renaming campaign that took place during Nazi German for things named after Jewish people be included in the article?
Editors in numerous discussions have agreed that this article must be trimmed, but disagree on what content should be cut. In source editing, the second presidency section of this article is 10,462 words and 68,064 characters.
Should the lead of this article keep or remove the sentence "Trump's actions, especially in his second term, have been described as authoritarian and contributing to democratic backsliding."
Hello, regarding to this article. Should we use the infobox historical era layout instead of this infobox country one? Since Fascist Italy can be a broad concept, it can be referred to as the Kingdom of Italy from 1922 to 1943 (this article) and the Italian Social Republic from 1943 to 1945, something like a disambiguation. Although the article's main point was about the Kingdom of Italy under Fascism, it was a historical period within the state. Note that our article on Vargas era previously used the infobox country template, but now they changed it to the infobox historical era one. I think this article should follow suit. RatMan7108 (talk) 15:42, 30 November 2025 (UTC)
Are the below sources sufficient to say in Wikivoice there is consensus among genocide scholars there is genocide?
If so, is it WP:DUE to say this in the final sentence of the lead paragraph like proposed?
If 1. is voted true, we will be able to say there is scholarly consensus in Wikivoice with sourcing but without attribution across Wikipedia per WP:CONLEVEL (this will be considered the global consensus).Alexandraaaacs1989 (talk) 05:55, 30 November 2025 (UTC)
Prior discussions and attempts at dispute resolution, fulfilling WP:RFCBEFORE, can be found here and here.
Should the following statement be included under the "India" subsection of the "Reactions" section?
Opposition leader Rahul Gandhi criticised Modi's acceptance of the ceasefire, alleging that it amounted to a surrender under pressure from Trump.[3][4]
Add the tag {{rfc|xxx}} at the top of a talk page section, where "xxx" is the category abbreviation. The different category abbreviations that should be used with {{rfc}} are listed above in parenthesis. Multiple categories are separated by a vertical pipe. For example, {{rfc|xxx|yyy}}, where "xxx" is the first category and "yyy" is the second category.
