Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tiger OS

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was redirect. Woohookitty 06:57, 6 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Tiger OS

Nothing on Google, crappy article, and in the article it says the company says it won't release any info until 2006. Delete --Shanel 20:29, 28 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - although a rubbish article isn't grounds for deletion, we don't have anything to go on on this new OS. Hell, Apple might not even survive that long. Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. Rob Church ^{Talk | Desk} 20:31, 28 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Yeah, they've been saying that about Apple since 1985. Dpbsmith (talk) 18:28, 29 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete with an additional SD tag added. Paul Klenk 00:17, 29 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as unverifiable. Borderline speedy. Would a serious company with any likelihood of producing a real OS use a name already [trademarked by Apple]? Dpbsmith (talk) 01:11, 29 August 2005 (UTC) Changing vote, see below[reply]
Redirect without merge into Mac OS X v10.4 ("Tiger"). Andrew pmk | Talk 03:15, 29 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to mac tiger, as per andrew's suggestion __earth 04:48, August 29, 2005 (UTC)
Delete. nonnotable -R. S. Shaw 05:39, 29 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to OSX Tiger as suggested. Expand to full article when, or if, it gets actually released and becomes more notable. (Really funny pic though. Rip-off of Debian logo, "based on Linux and FreeDOS", har har...=) --Wwwwolf 16:36, 29 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect without merge into Mac OS X v10.4 ("Tiger") as suggested by Andrew pmk. Reduces the chance of re-creation and "Tiger OS" is a fairly plausible title for an article about Mac OS X v 10.4. Dpbsmith (talk) 18:26, 29 August 2005 (UTC) Dpbsmith (talk) 18:26, 29 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect without merge. -Sean Curtin 01:28, August 30, 2005 (UTC)
Redirect as per Andrew pmk. Dread Lord CyberSkull ✎☠ 21:30, 2005 September 2 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.