🇮🇷 Iran Proxy | https://www.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Deletion_sorting/Hungary
Jump to content

Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Hungary

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is a collection of discussions on the deletion of articles related to Hungary. It is one of many deletion lists coordinated by WikiProject Deletion sorting. Anyone can help maintain the list on this page.

Adding a new AfD discussion
Adding an AfD to this page does not add it to the main page at WP:AFD. Similarly, removing an AfD from this page does not remove it from the main page at WP:AFD. If you want to nominate an article for deletion, go through the process on that page before adding it to this page. To add a discussion to this page, follow these steps:
  1. Edit this page and add {{Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PageName}} to the top of the list. Replace "PageName" with the relevant article name, i.e. the one on the existing AFD discussion. Also, indicate the title of the article in the edit summary as it is particularly helpful to add a link to the article in the edit summary. When you save the page, the discussion will automatically appear.
  2. You should also tag the AfD by adding {{subst:delsort|Hungary|~~~~}} to it, which will inform editors that it has been listed here. You may place this tag above or below the nomination statement or at the end of the discussion thread.
There are a few scripts and tools that can make this easier.
Removing a closed AfD discussion
Closed AfD discussions are automatically removed by a bot.
Other types of discussions
You can also add and remove other discussions (prod, CfD, TfD etc.) related to Hungary. For the other XfD's, the process is the same as AfD (except {{Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/PageName}} is used for MFD and {{transclude xfd}} for the rest). For PRODs, adding a link with {{prodded}} will suffice.
Further information
For further information see Wikipedia's deletion policy and WP:AfD for general information about Articles for Deletion, including a list of article deletions sorted by day of nomination.

This list is also part of the larger list of deletion debates related to Europe.

Archived discussions (starting from September 2007) may be found at:
Purge page cache watch
Scan for Hungary related AfDs

Scan for Hungary related Prods
Scan for Hungary related TfDs


Hungary

[edit]
Orsi Kocsis (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Neutral nomination. WP:BLPREQUESTDELETE from ip address who says she's the subject.[1] Article does not seem to have strong sources but probably needs to be evaluated by people familiar with Hungarian sources. Morbidthoughts (talk) 23:59, 6 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Franciscus Illenfeld (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unsourced. Fails WP:GNG.4meter4 (talk) 01:13, 5 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Csanyik (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I found only passing mentions in sources, but nothing with more than a sentence on this valley. Fails WP:GNG.4meter4 (talk) 04:33, 25 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  • Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Hungary-related deletion discussions. 4meter4 (talk) 04:33, 25 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch 22:03, 25 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment. Unfortunately I found a bunch of blogs in Hungarian that seem to be duplicating the information found on Wikipedia. A detailed one here [4] has a list of sources, and cites the information about this valley to Györffy György I-IV (1963-1998) : Az Árpád- kor történeti földrajza. Katzrockso (talk) 03:46, 26 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Merge into Miskolc relevant stuff that has been added since nomination. I have not been able to find any in-depth sources. The above mentioned Az Árpád-kori Magyarország történeti földrajza I. also doesn't have a lot about it, only a short paragraph. Kovcszaln6 (talk) 17:57, 26 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    Can you quote what's in that work or explain where to find the source text? Katzrockso (talk) 00:19, 28 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    Csenik 1313/339: t-m ... populosam Chenyk! vocatam prope v-m Gewr! (Egri k. o. lt. AB. 5!, F. VIII/6. 30); 1315/339: v-m ... Chenyk vocatam prope eandem Gewr! ... sep. t-m Gewr! a t. Chyenyk (Egri k. o. lt. AB. 5!, F. VIII/6. 35); 1317/318: v. Chenyg (Egri k. o. lt. AF. 50).
    E lakott földet [Ákos nb.] Ernei bán fia István adta 1313-ban a diósgyőri ágostonos (pálos) remetéknek. Az 1315-i új adománykor már falu, melynek tartozékai között malom is szerepel (cum t. arabili et inarabili, pratis seu fenetilibus!, silvis et mol-o). Határát Győr felől (?) így írták le: St. pal. 1315/339: ... de supercilio montis Gulbuka! a pt. Or! et desc. ad 1 vallem ... desc. ad aquam Synua! ... ad Zacharispothoka! et per eandem vallem Zachariaspothoka ... ad magnam viam, que ducit in! Dedus ... ad Rakatyas! ... ad Begas tow! ... ad viam, que circuit, montem Gala vocatum et per eandem viam vergit ad Stanfeu et per supercilium eiusdem montis Stan ... ad Chokasku!; ex alia parte Synua ... ad montem ... (I. h. A szóban forgó hn-ek közül fennmaradt: Kneidinger: Diósgyőr térk. 1770 k. OL. Kam. térk. 830. 53. sz.: Rakottyás tó (erdő); 1886/888. térk: Szinva, Csókás, Békató és Gálya forrás). 1317-ben a pálos provinciális megerősíti az adományt. -- Ma hn. Diósgyőrtől ÉNy-ra. 1886/888. térk: Csenik vgy.; Hnt. 56: Csanyikvölgy. (Cs. I. 170.)
    (Quoted exactly as written.) Kovcszaln6 (talk) 15:20, 28 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    @Rupples here is information on the historical village. Machine translated, it verified the information about 1313-1315 and connects it to the modern place-name at the end. Katzrockso (talk) 23:29, 28 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment. I wouldn't be opposed to a merge to Miskolc per WP:ATD now that the article's sourcing has significantly improved (for verifiability but not notability).4meter4 (talk) 18:08, 26 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge to Miskolc as an AtD. While there's plenty of mentions, I haven't found anything substantial. Would consider Keep if sources can be found to verify and talk in some detail about the medieval village. Rupples (talk) 21:20, 26 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Svartner (talk) 06:55, 2 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Others

[edit]

Categories

[edit]

Deletion reviews

[edit]

Miscellaneous

[edit]

Proposed deletions

[edit]


Redirects

[edit]

Templates

[edit]

See also

[edit]