🇮🇷 Iran Proxy | https://www.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Deletion_sorting/Spain
Jump to content

Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Spain

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Shortcuts
Deletion Sorting
Project

This is a collection of discussions on the deletion of articles related to Spain. It is one of many deletion lists coordinated by WikiProject Deletion sorting. Anyone can help maintain the list on this page.

Adding a new AfD discussion
Adding an AfD to this page does not add it to the main page at WP:AFD. Similarly, removing an AfD from this page does not remove it from the main page at WP:AFD. If you want to nominate an article for deletion, go through the process on that page before adding it to this page. To add a discussion to this page, follow these steps:
  1. Edit this page and add {{Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PageName}} to the top of the list. Replace "PageName" with the relevant article name, i.e. the one on the existing AFD discussion. Also, indicate the title of the article in the edit summary as it is particularly helpful to add a link to the article in the edit summary. When you save the page, the discussion will automatically appear.
  2. You should also tag the AfD by adding {{subst:delsort|Spain|~~~~}} to it, which will inform editors that it has been listed here. You may place this tag above or below the nomination statement or at the end of the discussion thread.
There are a few scripts and tools that can make this easier.
Removing a closed AfD discussion
Closed AfD discussions are automatically removed by a bot.
Other types of discussions
You can also add and remove other discussions (prod, CfD, TfD etc.) related to Spain. For the other XfD's, the process is the same as AfD (except {{Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/PageName}} is used for MFD and {{transclude xfd}} for the rest). For PRODs, adding a link with {{prodded}} will suffice.
Further information
For further information see Wikipedia's deletion policy and WP:AfD for general information about Articles for Deletion, including a list of article deletions sorted by day of nomination.

This list is also part of the larger list of deletion debates related to Europe.

Archived discussions (starting from September 2007) may be found at:
Purge page cache watch
Scan for Spain related AfDs

Scan for Spain related Prods
Scan for Spain related TfDs


Spain

[edit]

List of massacres in Western Sahara

[edit]
List of massacres in Western Sahara (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I’m not sure this is a valid list article. We have an article on both massacres included, but a list of two seems unnecessary. Mccapra (talk) 18:44, 6 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Voltio (carsharing company)

[edit]
Voltio (carsharing company) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is a company therefore GNG/WP:NCORP requires at least two deep or significant sources with each source containing "Independent Content" showing in-depth information *on the company*. "Independent content", in order to count towards establishing notability, must include original and independent opinion, analysis, investigation, and fact checking that are clearly attributable to a source unaffiliated to the subject. None of the sources in the article meet the criteria. I ask if people disagree, please point to specific content (e.g. the paragraph starting with the word ...) or pages where you believe there is in-depth indepdent *content* about the *company*. HighKing++ 09:21, 28 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  • Blogs are not reliable sources
  • Mutua.es is a blog. They are not considered reliable sources. Fails WP:RS.
  • Profiles or announcements on partner websites
  • Next we have a bunch of articles covering the initial announcement, all saying the same thing around the same week or so. It is PR and regurgitates company-provided information. None of these sources include any kind of "independent content" by way of in-depth opinion or analysis and they fail WP:ORGIND and/or WP:CORPDEPTH. (Did we really need all these sources in the article or is this an example of ref bloat?) I include the following in this selection:
  • Then we have various "expansion" or "discount code" announcements
While there is a lot of mentions in some notable pubications, none contain sufficient in-depth independent content. HighKing++ 10:28, 28 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Svartner (talk) 16:36, 5 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Andrés Blanco Ferro

[edit]
Andrés Blanco Ferro (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not yet notable per WP:BIO. No significant coverage found in a WP:BEFORE search from reliable, independent sources. His career seems to have got off to a fine start, and he's had routine coverage from his local newspaper La Región about his company, but the coverage available from RS is just passing mentions. There's also rather a lof of what appears to be paid placement in unreliable sources like deradios.com. Conflict of interest is evident from article creator's repeated uploads of selfies and social media photos as "own work", and laser focus on Blanco Ferro, with a few articles already deleted on obscure awards that he's received: see also WP:Articles for deletion/Ordo Supremus Militaris Templi Hierosolymitani (Spain), Order of Defence Merit (Cliponie) and Wikinews:Five Galicians Making Significant Contributions to Artificial Intelligence. Wikishovel (talk) 16:09, 4 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Galindo Garcés

[edit]
Galindo Garcés (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unsourced since 2004. This might be better covered at García Galíndez per WP:NOPAGE. I would suggest a merge, but it's unreferenced... So maybe delete is best?4meter4 (talk) 20:29, 27 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Article remains unsourced.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 01:32, 5 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Eugenia de Borbón

[edit]
Eugenia de Borbón (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:NOTGENEOLOGY – no real notability beyond her ties to French and Spanish royalty and some coverage of her presentation as a débutante. Probably redirect to her father's article. estar8806 (talk) ★ 20:53, 22 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  • Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women, Royalty and nobility, France, and Spain. Shellwood (talk) 21:43, 22 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Redirect is appropriate as suggested. Bearian (talk) 02:51, 25 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment. There's also earlier coverage of her, such as "Les 5 ans de la princesse Eugénie de Bourbon". Noblesse & Royautés (in French). 2012-03-07. Retrieved 2025-11-25. and "La hija de Luis Alfonso será bautizada mañana en una solemne ceremonia". ¡Hola! (in Spanish). 2007-05-31. Archived from the original on 2023-11-01. Retrieved 2025-11-25. If these two sources are reliable (and they seem to be), I think she passes notability. We have an article on ¡Hola! but not Noblesse & Royautés, but a source can be reliable without itself being notable. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 19:51, 25 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per coverage in ¡Hola!, Vogue, and Tatler. -- Willthacheerleader18 (talk) 19:18, 29 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Redirect per nom. Hola contains 100 words about her baptism, no sigcov. Vogue contains one sentence of prose on her. Keep Tatler is OK, but it is only one source related to her presentation as a débutante as said above. Kelob2678 (talk) 21:38, 29 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: I should have specified, I meant this Hola article, this Hola article, this Hola article, and this Hola article that are entirely about her. She meets WP:Significant Coverage in Spanish sources. -- Willthacheerleader18 (talk) 23:40, 29 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
You are right, there is lots of coverage of the debutante[2], her 18th birthday[3], and some additional coverage from Hola unrelated to either of those events. Kelob2678 (talk) 23:58, 29 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, TheInevitables (talk) 04:10, 30 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
You mention WP:NOTINHERITED, which clearly states: "Individuals in close, personal relationships with famous people (including politicians) can have an independent article even if they are known solely for such a relationship, but only if they pass WP:GNG.'" -- Willthacheerleader18 (talk) 14:44, 1 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Redirect to Louis Alphonse de Bourbon: like 4m4 says I would say that this is only because of who her parents are (father is). I found this AfD from the debutante ball page and most of the other girls there are redirects to their parents (dads) and the few that aren't have more substantial articles about them outside of being born to such and such person. Moritoriko (talk) 06:35, 1 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Firstly, I went and looked at the Le Bal des débutantes article and none of the debutantes listed there are redirects, they are all independent articles. Secondly, per WP:Notability, "That person A has a relationship with well-known person B, such as being a spouse or child, is not a reason for a standalone article on A (unless significant coverage can be found on A)". That coverage exists. It doesn't matter if she gets coverage because of who her parents are, it's that she gets coverage. -- Willthacheerleader18 (talk) 14:41, 1 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I continue to think that the coverage of her is not significant (yet) and another important thing look at is the coverage in this article. There are 370 words in the article by my count and less than half of them are about her with the article mostly giving the geneology (which is why this article was nominated).
Also does she have American citizenship since she was born in Miami? Moritoriko (talk) 00:59, 2 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The coverage in the article is not relevant to this deletion discussion because article content does not determine notability. Her national status isn't really relevant to this discussion either. I have already listed 4 ¡Hola! articles above that are fully centered on her, not including the many more about her participation in le Bal des débutantes. That shows that she meets, at least, WP:GNG. -- Willthacheerleader18 (talk) 02:18, 2 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry yes, the nationality is completely unrelated. I agree, current article content does not determine notability, I was just using it as a proxy to show how much of the coverage of her is really just about her parents/family which is relevant to this discussion. At the present moment I think that WP:PAGEDECIDE's section about providing context is a great reason for her to be included (more) on her father's page because almost all coverage of her is in the context of him. Moritoriko (talk) 05:42, 2 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
While her family is mentioned in almost every source, I find that typical of almost all royal reporting, even of the British royals. This article is about her equestrian career, this article is about her birthday and covers much of her childhood, this one is about her society debut.. they don't all center on her parents, they simply mention the connections. -- Willthacheerleader18 (talk)
Yes, I removed that sentence. The previous version stated: "Many others are daughters of actors and industry tycoons, such as Ava Philippe, Jane Li, Annabel Yao, Stella Belmondo, True Whitaker, Ella Beatty, Viola Mikkelsen, Sophia-Rose Stallone, Scout LaRue, Ondine and Harper Peck, and Natasha Connery" and everyone but Ella Beatty is a redirect. This is what I was referring to. Moritoriko (talk) 05:49, 2 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Ah, I see now in the edit history. Thanks for that. That article needs a lot of work. However, other debutantes' notability or lack thereof is not relevant to the discussion of de Borbón's notability. -- Willthacheerleader18 (talk) 14:53, 2 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Rainbowtrail (talk) 20:33, 2 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Svartner (talk) 08:13, 7 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thor (video game)

[edit]
Thor (video game) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Lack of notability - the only sources on the article are a GameSpot database listing (unreliable per WP:VG/RS as it is shared with GameFAQS), a Youtube gameplay video (see WP:RSPYT), and a playable version of the game on the Internet Archive. None of these sources indicate notability and I was unable to find any sources in my Archive.org search discussing the game, though Spectrum Computing lists a Preview and Review from Microhobby magazine. Despite the Microhobby coverage I do not think that GNG is met. Has been PRODded - PROD was removed by the creator of the article after adding the Youtube and IA references. Waxworker (talk) 21:53, 20 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  • Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Video games and Spain. Waxworker (talk) 21:53, 20 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    AFD is definitely the right venue for this since it was de-PRODded. Perhaps the creator misunderstood our notability guidelines? Anyhow, I'm going to !vote delete per WP:NOTPLOT here. Like I have said several times before on other AFD's, reception is perhaps the most important section when writing about something related to video games in regards to notability, and the article doesn't bother to discuss that. Gommeh 📖   🎮 22:01, 20 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep - Found a review by Micromanía: [4]. Meets the minimum notability guideline with 2 reviews. There's also this walkthrough, though I don't think it qualifies as significant coverage since it doesn't seem to contain any critical analysis (but could be used to source gameplay section): [5]. --Mika1h (talk) 14:48, 21 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: There seems to be just two even remotely reliable independent sources on this game: a review in Microhobby and a review in Micromanía, both published around the time of the game's release. Two contemporary reviews do not constitute WP:SIGCOV - if someone is able to dig up some more in-depth contemporary sources, or find some modern sources discussing the game that I've missed in my search, I'll gladly change my vote, but currently I see no evidence to satisfy WP:GNG. Ethmostigmus 🌿 (talk | contribs) 08:31, 25 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 01:41, 28 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Doczilla Ohhhhhh, no! 21:00, 5 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]


Others

[edit]

Categories

Deletion reviews

Miscellaneous

Proposed deletions

Redirects

Templates

See also

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Deletion_sorting/Spain&oldid=1326115138"