Draft:Daniel Heyen
Submission declined on 2 December 2025 by Ibjaja055 (talk).
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
|
| Submission declined on 1 December 2025 by Theroadislong (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia articleâthat is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by Theroadislong 4 days ago. |
Comment: Per Wikimedia Foundation Terms of Use, I disclose that this article is about my employer. I confirm that I wrote it voluntarily, without request, and without immediate payment, compensation, or direction from my employer. Frederikho (talk) 14:03, 1 December 2025 (UTC)
Daniel Heyen (born 7 June 1981 in Köln) is a German environmental economist and university professor. He holds the Chair of Environmental Economics at the RPTU University Kaiserslautern-Landau in Germany. Heyen's work focuses on decision-making under uncertainty and the governance of climate engineering. He is known for contributions to the economics of geoengineering, particularly solar radiation management (SRM), and for his academic publications on the role of risk, ambiguity, and precaution in climate policy.
Academic career
[edit]Heyen studied physics and mathematics at Heidelberg University, earning a diploma (equivalent to an M.Sc.) in mathematics in 2009. He pursued his doctoral studies at the same institution under the interdisciplinary Marsilius-Kolleg project âThe Global Governance of Climate Engineering,â receiving his Ph.D. in economics (Dr. rer. pol.) in 2015. His dissertation, titled Five Essays in the Economics of Climate Engineering, Research, and Regulation under Uncertainty, comprised five self-contained studies on geoengineering policy and decision theory.[1]
Following his doctorate, Heyen worked as a postdoctoral researcher at the Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment at the London School of Economics and later at the Chair of Integrative Risk Management and Economics at ETH Zurich. In 2021, he was appointed Professor of Environmental Economics at RPTU Kaiserslautern-Landau.[2] He is also a Fellow of the CESifo Research Network and an associate researcher affiliated with ETH Zurich.[3] Heyen is a member of the Standing Field Committee for Environmental and Resource Economics of the German Economic Association (AURĂ).[4]
Research contributions
[edit]Heyenâs research centres on the economics of climate change, with a focus on decision-making under uncertainty and the governance of emerging climate-engineering technologies, notably solar radiation management.
He has published in peer-reviewed journals such as Environmental and Resource Economics, Climatic Change, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Theory and Decision, Journal of Mathematical Economics, Science, and Nature Communications.[5][6][7] His work explores SRMâs strategic implications for mitigation incentives, international research dynamics and distributional effects, as well as how precautionary regulatory approaches shape information acquisition. Heyen also contributes to interdisciplinary German initiatives that address the social, legal and ethical dimensions of climate intervention.
A 2025 feature in the RPTU research magazine portrays Heyenâs work as focusing on how low costs and high immediacy of solar geoengineering could alter international power relations and create âa climate policy balance of terrorâ if governance remains weak.[8]
Reception
[edit]Heyen has been quoted by German media outlets for his expertise on the risks, ethics, and governance of climate intervention technologies.
His analysis of âcounter-geoengineeringâ scenariosâwhere one state attempts to neutralise another stateâs solar geoengineering through opposing interventionsâhas received attention in the German press. In a 2017 article on climate engineering in the newspaper SĂŒddeutsche Zeitung, Heyen is cited for modelling how such countermeasures can lead to an arms-race-like escalation in climate intervention, with risks of severe side effects even if global temperature averages offset. [9]
In November 2021, the Swiss public broadcaster SRF 2 Kultur featured Heyen in its programme Wissenschaftsmagazin in a dedicated segment on the an article he co-authored and published in Science.[10] Heyen argued in the segment that solar geoengineering is a âdangerous, hard-to-assess technologyâ that might nevertheless gain salience as global warming progresses. The same article was also covered by the think tank Resources for the Future.[11]
In October 2024, the German newspaper Der Tagesspiegel published a joint expert piece on geoengineering that included Heyen as a commentator. Heyen outlined the chances and risks of solar geoengineering research, stressing that better knowledge is needed before any policy decisions are made.[12]
In an October 2024 interview with SWR Kultur, Heyen discussed new ethical guidelines for geoengineering research by the American Geophysical Union.[13] He welcomed the initiative, highlighting its emphasis on transparency, public participation, and framing geoengineering as a potential complementânot a substituteâfor emissions reduction. However, he warned that ethical demands could be misused to block legitimate research, arguing that ânot researching is also a risky decisionâ.
Web links
[edit]References
[edit]- ^ Heyen, Daniel (2015). "Five Essays in the Economics of Climate Engineering, Research, and Regulation under Uncertainty". heiDOK â Heidelberg University Library. doi:10.11588/heidok.00018775.
- ^ "Prof. Dr. Daniel Heyen â Environmental Economics". RPTU KaiserslauternâLandau. Retrieved 2025-12-01.
- ^ "Daniel Heyen". ifo/CESifo. Retrieved 2025-12-02.
- ^ "CV â Daniel Heyen". Personal website of Daniel Heyen. Retrieved 2025-12-01.
- ^ Joseph E. Aldy; Daniel Heyen (2021-11-19). "Social Science Research to Inform Solar Geoengineering". Science. Retrieved 2025-12-02.
{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) - ^ Anthony R. Harding; Kate Ricke; Douglas G. MacMartin; Juan Moreno-Cruz (2020-01-15). "Climate econometric models indicate solar geoengineering would reduce inter-country income inequality". Nature Communications. Retrieved 2025-12-02.
{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) - ^ "Daniel Heyen - Google Scholar". Daniel Heyen on Google Scholar. Retrieved 2025-12-01.
- ^ Karcher, Christoph (2025-11-05). "World-changing interventions carry major risks". RPTU Research Magazine. Retrieved 2025-12-01.
- ^ MĂ€der, Alexander (2017-10-18). "Climate Engineering: Riskantes Herumdoktern am Klima". SĂŒddeutsche Zeitung. Retrieved 2025-12-01.
- ^ HĂ€usler, Thomas (2021-11-13). "Umstrittenes Geoengineering zurĂŒck in der Klimadebatte". Wissenschaftsmagazin, Radio SRF 2 Kultur. Retrieved 2025-12-01.
- ^ "To Understand Solar Geoengineering, We Need the Social Sciences". Resources for the Future. 2021-11-18. Retrieved 2025-12-02.
- ^ "DĂŒrren, Fluten, Tornados: Muss die Menschheit den Klimawandel mit Geoengineering bekĂ€mpfen?". Der Tagesspiegel. 2024-10-01. Retrieved 2025-12-01.
- ^ "Neues Radiointerview mit Prof. Daniel Heyen". RPTU KaiserslauternâLandau. 2025-10-29.

- meet any of the eight academic-specific criteria
- or cite multiple reliable, secondary sources independent of the subject, which cover the subject in some depth
Make sure your draft meets one of the criteria above before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If the subject does not meet any of the criteria, it is not suitable for Wikipedia.