Talk:Rosa Dubovsky: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 18:10, 29 October 2025

Rosa Dubovsky has been listed as one of the History good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: October 29, 2025. (Reviewed version).

Anarchism

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anarchism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of anarchism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AnarchismWikipedia:WikiProject AnarchismTemplate:WikiProject Anarchismanarchism

Argentina Low‑importance

	Argentina portal This article is part of WikiProject Argentina, an attempt to expand, improve and standardise the content and structure of articles related to Argentina. If you would like to participate, you can improve Rosa Dubovsky, or sign up and contribute to a wider array of articles like those on our to do list.ArgentinaWikipedia:WikiProject ArgentinaTemplate:WikiProject ArgentinaArgentine
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Biography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography

Feminism Low‑importance

	Feminism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Feminism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Feminism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FeminismWikipedia:WikiProject FeminismTemplate:WikiProject FeminismFeminism
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Jewish Women Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Jewish Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Jewish Women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Jewish WomenWikipedia:WikiProject Jewish WomenTemplate:WikiProject Jewish WomenJewish Women
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Organized Labour

	Organized Labour portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organized Labour, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Organized Labour on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Organized LabourWikipedia:WikiProject Organized LabourTemplate:WikiProject Organized Labourorganized labour
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Ukraine

	Ukraine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ukraine, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Ukraine on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.UkraineWikipedia:WikiProject UkraineTemplate:WikiProject UkraineUkraine
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Women's History

	History portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Women in Green: What Women Do

This article was created or improved during the What Women Do GA edit-a-thon hosted by the Women in Green project in October 2025. The editor(s) involved may be new; please assume good faith regarding their contributions before making changes.Women in GreenWikipedia:WikiProject Women in GreenTemplate:WikiProject Women in GreenWomen in Green

GA review

Passed. ~ L 🌸 (talk) 18:10, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

This review is transcluded from Talk:Rosa Dubovsky/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: Grnrchst (talk · contribs) 18:58, 27 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: LEvalyn (talk · contribs) 02:22, 28 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I will take on this review! I typically prefer to make smallish prose edits myself and only place comments here when I have questions, though of course as always you should feel free to change or discuss any edits you happen to disagree with. Looking forward to it! ~ L 🌸 (talk) 02:22, 28 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

All right, the article itself is looking wonderful, so I just have the one concern about the image to be addressed! ~ L 🌸 (talk) 03:30, 28 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Good Article review progress box

Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV ()

3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant ()

Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed

Comments

Notes

It might be nice to use a crop that is just of her head and shoulders in the infobox, and then the whole family photo in the body of the article, since it's currently hard to see her well in the infobox. ~ L 🌸 (talk) 03:30, 28 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Added a cropped photo. --Grnrchst (talk) 09:54, 28 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I'd be curious to know where her husband was while she was in France. ~ L 🌸 (talk) 03:30, 28 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@LEvalyn: Added the information about this; seems he went straight to Argentina and they reunited there later. --Grnrchst (talk) 09:43, 28 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I did a prose editing pass and made a few small changes; everything looks great. ~ L 🌸 (talk) 03:30, 28 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Thinking about breadth, the article seems short but I can't think of a major topic which is excluded. The core biographical facts are explained, several of her key views are mentioned, she has no publications which would need further explication, and the idea of legacy/influence is addressed. So, I am satisfied on this criteria. ~ L 🌸 (talk) 03:30, 28 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah I only nominated this for GA after I was confident there wasn't anything else out there that I was missing. Ideally I'd be able to have a look at the sources in the further reading, but they're either very obscure or in libraries an ocean away from me. --Grnrchst (talk) 09:56, 28 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
For my spot check I looked at cites 8, 9, and 23 as numbered in this diff. Everything verifies without copyvio or close paraphrase. The source check also reinforces my assessment above that there isn't much more information out there being omitted from this article. ~ L 🌸 (talk) 03:30, 28 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Suggestions / questions

Unfortunately I must quibble with the licensing of the photo in the infobox -- it is surely not an "own work" from 2023. It's almost certainly public domain, but can you track down the more accurate free use rationale? ~ L 🌸 (talk) 03:30, 28 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@LEvalyn: I haven't been able to find any evidence of this photograph being published before it was uploaded to commons in 2023, so it's certainly possible that this was its first publication and that the license is correct (if this was in their archives or something). Public domain status for photographs taken in Argentina is 20 years after publication, so if this hasn't been published before, this might actually be the correct license to upload it with. Judging by the ages of the kids, I've estimated that this was taken in the late 1920s (or maybe early 1930s), but I don't know any information about the photographer. On the Wikicommons talk page, I have asked the uploader if they can provide any more information, although they have been inactive for two years, so I don't know if I will receive a prompt response. --Grnrchst (talk) 09:40, 28 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hmm, I agree it's quite likely that this is the first publication of the image and the editor in 2023 did take that photo of it, but I'm not sure that the editor would have had the rights to choose to publish it as creative commons? Owning the physical photo doesn't confer copyright, which would still belong to the 1920s photographer (or really, their heirs) if it's not public domain for some other reason. I really am not familiar with Argentine copyright law so I may be entirely misunderstanding something. The info here didn't help as much as I would have liked; it seems to imply that published photos expire after 20 years but unpublished photos never have the clock start ticking?? However, it looks like copyright was not introduced in Argentina until 1933, so that may mean anything before 1933 is public domain and a simple pd-1996 tag will cover it? Since her husband is clearly pictured, it must date from before 1936, and based on the ages I think pre-1933 is most likely. I do think the image needs to have some kind of public domain tag rather than creative commons, probably using this overall license with the various specifics filled in. ~ L 🌸 (talk) 19:45, 28 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@LEvalyn: Would adding PD-1996 make sense, given all of its criteria are about date of publication (and this was apparently first published in 2023)? Honestly jumping through these absurd hoops established by US copyright law is my least favourite part of GA and especially FA reviews, but we have to do it. --Grnrchst (talk) 11:16, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Having slept on it, pd-1996 sounds good to me. Thanks for wrangling with it, I know it’s much less interesting than actually writing something. ~ L 🌸 (talk) 16:03, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I found the conversation you started over at Commons illuminating, and added what I think is the most accurate / more thorough license. I'm satisfied that due diligence has happened here and a reasonable public domain rationale is now documented for the photo. Since that was my only quibble, I'll now pass the GA! ~ L 🌸 (talk) 18:07, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
+{{GA|18:10, 29 October 2025 (UTC)|topic=History|page=1|oldid=1319195091}}
-{{GA nominee|18:58, 27 October 2025 (UTC)|nominator=[[User:Grnrchst|Grnrchst]] ([[User talk:Grnrchst|talk]])|page=1|subtopic=World history|status=onreview|note=I [[WP:GARP|pledge]] that when this article gets reviewed, I will review two other articles.|shortdesc=Argentinian activist, feminist and anarchist}}
-{{WikiProject banner shell|class=C|listas=Dubovsky, Rosa|blp=no|1=
+{{WikiProject banner shell|class=GA|listas=Dubovsky, Rosa|blp=no|1=
 {{WikiProject Anarchism }}
 {{WikiProject Argentina|importance=Low}}

LEvalyn (talk | contribs)

Revision as of 18:10, 29 October 2025

GA review

Comments

Notes

Suggestions / questions