🇮🇷 Iran Proxy | https://www.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:General_Dynamics
Jump to content

Talk:General Dynamics

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Updating the history content section, 1899-1975

[edit]

@Thewellman and I discussed my proposed updates to the General Dynamics History content 1899-1975 on my talk page. I've copied his thoughts here for visibility:

"I greatly admire the history section of your General Dynamics sandbox article. I have just a few comments about the last paragraph of the 1941-1960 section. Aside from the misspelling of General, I seem to remember the first Polaris boats were modifications of Skipjack-class attack submarines under construction with contract modification separating bow and stern sections to insert the missile tube compartment to hasten availability of the weapon system. If so, I think that might be worthy of mention."

Since then, I made the recommended updates to the content so it's ready for inclusion on the Wikipedia article. The proposed content is in the collapsed section since it's so long.--Chefmikesf (talk) 18:16, 13 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Grand'mere Eugene, I recently re-worked the history content 1899-1980 because it was out of chronological order and was missing some key facts and dates. In my proposed draft below, I have added new subsections for 40-year eras, incorporated additional historical references, and included more key facts about the company, all while preserving as much of the existing content as possible. I recognize that if the draft is implemented, we will need to rename some reference names that are on my sandbox. Any thoughts on the history draft?--Chefmikesf (talk) 20:31, 15 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I got stuck verifying info from the first 2 citations-- the Duffy Daugherty doi and jstor links don't work. The text using the Funding Universe source doesn't accurately reflect the text from the source, so I added a quote parameter to encourage re-phrasing that bit. Will return to this project another day... Grand'mere Eugene (talk) 23:12, 18 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Also having trouble verifying Electric Boat's sale of the first USS Holland for $300,000: This source may be helpful, stating, "Holland made some alterations and after a final test in March 1900 the U.S. Government bought the Holland No. 6 on April 12, 1900 for $150,000 - a bargain price, as it had cost twice as much to produce. It was commissioned on October 12, 1900, the first submarine of the American Navy." Grand'mere Eugene (talk) 23:10, 19 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hi @Grand'mere Eugene, Yes that looks like a good source. if you think it passes notability. Also, I went down to the library today and took out a few of the books about the company. I'm going to add and replace the missing sources this weekend to make the sources easier for your review.--Chefmikesf (talk) 23:33, 19 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Chefmikesf, Thanks, I'll check back next Wednesday— will be at the beach for a few days, so should have time to look at it then. Grand'mere Eugene (talk) 04:08, 20 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hi @Grand'mere Eugene, I added more references to fill in some of the gaps. Just for context, some of the unsourced narrative is from existing content in the existing history section. I tried to keep as much of the existing content in my proposed updated History section. If you think it needs references too, I'll add what I can from there books in my possession. please let me know where else to add better sourcing. --Chefmikesf (talk) 22:26, 24 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hi @Grand'mere Eugene I wanted to check if you had a chance to review the new references. Let me know if I need to add some more!--Chefmikesf (talk) 17:59, 6 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I made a start... it occurs to me this section would benefit from some vintage photos-- the older ones that have been published don't carry copyright before 1930... Grand'mere Eugene (talk) 02:52, 7 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
About 3/4 done checking sources-- reminds me of grading piles of students' research papers at the end of term...
I really enjoyed the section on Erik Nitsche's posters. Any chance you might get approval to include any of them as images to illustrate the GD article? Grand'mere Eugene (talk) 23:29, 7 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Chefmikesf, I finished checking the last section today. I assumed good faith for book sources, though using the quote parameter would be a good idea if we're being picky. I added a couple of sources where other WP articles (and sources) were touched on in the text. Let me know if you need help deciphering my comments. Grand'mere Eugene (talk) 21:39, 8 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hi @Grand'mere Eugene, I appreciate the thoroughness of the review. Much of the unsourced content was and still is existing content on the current General Dynamics Wikipedia article that I integrated into my draft. I will make another pass to add as many sources as possible, as requested. I have some of the books with me from the library, so I'll add some of the quote parameters to the sources.
We will not get any permissions for the Erik Nitsche posters. I asked already. Interesting fact: Eric illustrated the annual reports during his tenure, too. I've had the privilege to see the primary source artifacts in person. So cool!
There are quite a few General Dynamics images on Commons, I'll select a few for your review and consideration.----Chefmikesf (talk) 00:18, 9 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I just noticed this statement on Holland Torpedo Boat Company: "Holland's next boat was the Holland VI, launched May 17, 1897, later renamed USS Holland (SS-1) after being sold to the US Navy for $150,000 (half the production cost)." Maybe check the history/sources on that page, too? Grand'mere Eugene (talk) 21:32, 20 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hi @Grand'mere Eugene, I factchecked the USS Holland sentence for both articles and found it is correct in the book, The Defender. I updated the content for the USS Holland and added 15 or so references to address all your notes. I still need to find a source about John Naish succeeded Joseph McNarney so I'll keep searching for that source while you review the rest of the content.--Chefmikesf (talk) 21:22, 21 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Grand'mere Eugene I realized I replaced the reference tags you added. Can you see where a replaced them with better references or should I add them back?--Chefmikesf (talk) 23:44, 27 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Grand'mere Eugene Found it!-Chefmikesf (talk) 01:34, 28 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I think I probably inadvertently overwrote your last edit, as I was just finishing checking the sources you added earlier.
Which sections will be replaced by the new text? Grand'mere Eugene (talk) 02:39, 28 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Grand'mere Eugene No problem! The proposed sections we have been working on rewrites from Electric Boat to F-16 success. Once published, I'll start researching sources for 1975-present.
I realized this was actually an important rewrite. Whoever titled the history subsections just used the outline of the book "Brotherhood of Arms" and copied the narrative of the book.
The bouncing around from topic to topic matches the book.--Chefmikesf (talk) 02:52, 28 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Chefmikesf (talk) 18:16, 13 September 2025 (UTC) [reply]

Chefmikesf, I moved the above revision to the main article, substituting the History through 1980. Let me know if it needs modification. Grand'mere Eugene (talk) 06:04, 28 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks @Grand'mere Eugene, I'll review today and see if I have any suggestions. --Chefmikesf (talk) 15:06, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]