This article is part of WikiProject Alternative music, a group of Wikipedians interested in improving the encyclopedic coverage of articles relating to alternative rock. If you would like to help out, you are welcome to drop by the project page and/or leave a query at the project's talk page.Alternative musicWikipedia:WikiProject Alternative musicTemplate:WikiProject Alternative musicAlternative music
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AlbumsWikipedia:WikiProject AlbumsTemplate:WikiProject AlbumsAlbum
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Library of Congress, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Library of Congress on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Library of CongressWikipedia:WikiProject Library of CongressTemplate:WikiProject Library of CongressLibrary of Congress
Text and/or other creative content from Spencer Elden was copied or moved into Nevermind with this edit. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists.
The content of Spencer Elden was merged into Nevermind on 19 October 2017. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. For the discussion at that location, see its talk page.
If the page is gonna feature the chart positions for every anniversary and reissue version of the album then the page should also feature the tracklistings for the new versions. They contain new and different versions of songs and demos not on the album. 13thpunxfromthesun (talk) 18:04, 21 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Incorrect. That's not what generally happens. I see lots of pages for albums from other bands who have released anniversary deluxe editions that have all of the track listings for the special editions. RyanConnell5150 (talk) 21:37, 15 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
For the pages of those particular albums, are any of their extra track lists deemed notable? As in sourced and with a paragraph of information? Carlinal (talk) 16:35, 17 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
You're not giving any examples. It's not something I see around much, recently. In relation regarding their prominence, the EMI reissues for Radiohead albums got removed recently because those reissues were insignificant.
Besides, in the case of Nevermind, there are several reissues of the album, meaning at least four track lists comprising the original album and its three anniversary reissues. They would bloat the article so much and have more bytes used than most of the sections combined. And if you put that aside, where do you draw the line for including which reissue? It's so much information with so little substance in importance. Only Nirvana fans would bother with this, but Wikipedia is not a fansite. If a reissue charts high, that does not necessarily mean the extra tracks themselves would be notable, because they're more than likely hinging on the popularity of their parent album. I still don't see how adding these track lists would be truly useful for this encyclopedic article. Carlinal (talk) 22:12, 25 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
In the track-listing section, there is a note saying that Mark Lanegan claims to have made uncredited lyrical contributions to Something In The Way. But the source is quote from Nick Oliveri from after Lanegan had died. There are no other sources from anyone else or even Lanegan. Regardless these would still just be claims, not confirmed. Should it be removed? HGP7 (talk) 00:22, 1 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]