Talk:Wikimedia Foundation

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Wikimedia Foundation article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6: 28 days

Wikipedia Top‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Wikipedia, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's encyclopedic coverage of itself. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page. Please remember to avoid self-references and maintain a neutral point of view, even on topics relating to Wikipedia.WikipediaWikipedia:WikiProject WikipediaTemplate:WikiProject WikipediaWikipedia
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

Organizations Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

California: San Francisco Bay Area Low‑importance

	California portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	San Francisco Bay Area portal This article is supported by San Francisco Bay Area task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

Wikisource (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Wikisource, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.WikisourceWikipedia:WikiProject WikisourceTemplate:WikiProject WikisourceWikisource

Archives

This page has archives. Sections older than 28 days may be auto-archived by if there are more than 4.

prorata.ai / gist.ai / Wikipedia finances

As I understand prorata.ai's claims about it business model, using gist.ai as a search engine and finding content from Wikipedia should result in a financial transfer to (probably) the Wikimedia foundation.

Is there a good way of testing whether that's true? If it is, what are the advantages and disadvantages to Wikipedia from publicising it?

If the disadvantages are sufficiently severe, then someone should delete this section and tell me about it, possibly citing 'your edit to Talk:Wikimedia_Foundation', to avoid repeating the details.

ArthurDent006.5 (talk) 23:59, 31 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Political science

I found this subject really hard please help me to understand easily 2409:408A:8E37:586F:32A6:E0D0:AD80:4571 (talk) 15:53, 28 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Can you be more specific? What are you having difficulty with? 🌊 oceanloop 16:00, 28 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps you can have a look at wikibooks:Subject:Political science. Peaceray (talk) 16:51, 28 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Donate

84.56.216.238 (talk) 14:38, 11 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

revenue 2023/24

I learn: the revenue 2023/24 was $185,383,511. But in this statistic https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia%3AFundraising_statistics the revenue for 2023/24 is $180,174,103. (and the revenue for 22/23 is $185,383,511. What ist correct? ~2025-36803-18 (talk) 11:08, 27 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 5 December 2025

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

In the article, it says: > later switched to CirrusSearch which is based on Elasticsearch for searching

but as far as it seems, CirrusSearch is now using OpenSearch under the hood (which is a fork of Elasticsearch, since the license changes).

This should be amended. ~2025-38762-03 (talk) 20:13, 5 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. NotJamestack (✉️|📝) 21:31, 5 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]