🇮🇷 Iran Proxy | https://www.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:Did_you_know_nominations/Silver_Lake_(Washington)
Jump to content

Template:Did you know nominations/Silver Lake (Washington)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. You can locate your hook here. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Bunnypranav talk 05:14, 11 November 2025 (UTC)

Silver Lake (Washington)

  • Source: Downen, Mark R. (2004). North Cascades National Park High Lakes Fishery Management: Historic, Current, and Proposed Future Management of Sport Fish in High-Elevation Park Lakes (PDF) (Report). Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife. https://www.watrailblazers.org/science/ncnpfishmgmtrpt.pdf (page 25)
5x expanded by Generalissima (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 127 past nominations.

Generalissima (talk) (it/she) 20:11, 2 October 2025 (UTC).

  • Starting review--Kevmin § 17:04, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
    • Starting note, the article title should likely be adjusted to reflect several other notable Silver Lakes are present in Washington--Kevmin § 16:48, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
      • Fair enough, renamed to Silver Lake (Whatcom County, Washington)— Preceding unsigned comment added by Generalissima (talkcontribs)
      • Article expansion new enough and long enough. Article is fully cited and neutrally written. Portions of the history section are veering close to CLOP status however with the Silver Lake Natural Resource Area source and should be wordsmithed.--Kevmin § 18:50, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
        • Which portions? Generalissima (talk) (it/she) 18:51, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
          • The second half of sentence two, the fourth sentence and the last sentence are all very close paraphrases which should be reworded. (Also as a basic note, be cageful not to post below the end of the template here, I've move a couple of your replies up to make sure the templating isn't broken by accident.)--Kevmin § 16:44, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
          • @Generalissima:, Ive not seen any changes to the CLOP areas.--Kevmin § 02:27, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
            • @Kevmin: Oops! forgot about this, my bad. Should be fixed. Generalissima (talk) (it/she) 02:40, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
  • How does this meet WP:DYKINTEREST? organisms disappearing from certain areas, especially human impacted ones, is pretty normal. (t · c) buidhe 19:16, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
    • It's funny because of the name, it'd make a good quirky hook. Generalissima (talk) (it/she) 16:58, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
      • Article expansion new enough and long enough. Article is fully cited and neutrally written. Hook cited, verified to sourcing as accurate, and neutral, will work well for the quirky spot. QPQ done. Looks good to go.--Kevmin § 16:00, 18 October 2025 (UTC)