Template:Did you know nominations/Time Flies (video game)
Appearance
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Time Flies (video game)
- ... that it's possible for players can beat the video game Time Flies within two hours?
- Source: https://www.nintendolife.com/reviews/switch-eshop/time-flies "If Time Flies has a weakness, it’s one the game fully owns: it’s short. The game can be completed within two hours or so"
- ALT1: ... that time limits in the 2025 video game Time Flies are based on the life expectancy of the country the player selects? Source: Also from Nintendo Life "your in-game lifespan (measured in seconds) is tied to the average life expectancy of the country you're in. [...] You’re free to set any country as your location ahead of each ‘run’."
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Scarlett Spears
- Comment: This looks like another A Short Hike (as the name suggests) video game to me in terms of length. I have nominated this seven days after creation so should be alright.
JuniperChill (talk) 09:44, 28 November 2025 (UTC).
- Humble suggestion as article creator - there are plenty of short games out there - the WHO time limit thing is a much more unique and unusual hook I think! VRXCES (talk) 09:47, 28 November 2025 (UTC)
- I also feel like the article is a GA standard, even after skim reading. Do you plan to nominate this to GA in the (near) future? JuniperChill (talk) 20:47, 28 November 2025 (UTC)
- Thank you @JuniperChill: - yes, I plan to. Also suggesting a typo fix: that time limits in 2025 video game Time Flies are based on the life expectancy of the country the player selects? VRXCES (talk) 23:24, 3 December 2025 (UTC)
- Sure, i have fixed the typo JuniperChill (talk) 09:46, 4 December 2025 (UTC)
- Thank you @JuniperChill: - yes, I plan to. Also suggesting a typo fix: that time limits in 2025 video game Time Flies are based on the life expectancy of the country the player selects? VRXCES (talk) 23:24, 3 December 2025 (UTC)
- I also feel like the article is a GA standard, even after skim reading. Do you plan to nominate this to GA in the (near) future? JuniperChill (talk) 20:47, 28 November 2025 (UTC)
- Nominated to GA. Sorry, I missed another typo: time limits in the 2025.... Sorry! VRXCES (talk) 17:10, 4 December 2025 (UTC)
- Corrected typo again. Of course, these facts may be copyedited by someone at any point during the DYK process. And I see that not only was the article nominated for GA, but is now currently under review. JuniperChill (talk) 19:05, 4 December 2025 (UTC)
- Nominated to GA. Sorry, I missed another typo: time limits in the 2025.... Sorry! VRXCES (talk) 17:10, 4 December 2025 (UTC)