Template talk:Designation
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Designation template. |
|
| Archives: 1, 2Auto-archiving period: 3 months |
| This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||
| Template:Designation is permanently protected from editing as it is a heavily used or highly visible template. Substantial changes should first be proposed and discussed here on this page. If the proposal is uncontroversial or has been discussed and is supported by consensus, editors may use {{edit template-protected}} to notify an administrator or template editor to make the requested edit. Usually, any contributor may edit the template's documentation to add usage notes or categories.
Any contributor may edit the template's sandbox. Functionality of the template can be checked using test cases. |
| This template was considered for deletion on 2017 June 6. The result of the discussion was "keep". |
Template-protected edit request on 9 May 2025: Proposal to use Template:Lang with certain designation names
[edit]This edit request to Template:Designation/text has been answered. Set the |answered= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Description of suggested change: Hello. Per Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Text formatting#Non-English terms, I believe it would be appropriate to make use of Template:Lang with non-English designation titles, namely the national designations of France, the Netherlands, and Romania, and the provincial designation for Quebec.
Diff: Monument historique → Monument historique; Rijksmonument → Rijksmonument; Monument istoric → Monument istoric; Patrimoine culturel du Québec → Patrimoine culturel du Québec
Let me know what you think. Thanks! Rockhead126 (talk) 22:02, 9 May 2025 (UTC)
- @Rockhead126: Makes sense to me!
Done. Thanks for your contribution. Est. 2021 (talk · contribs) 03:45, 11 May 2025 (UTC)
Edit request 17 July 2025
[edit]This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Propose adding National Cultural Heritage of Peru. Here is the official national inventory of Peru’s cultural assets (4 888 entries), maintained by the Ministry of Foreign Trade and Tourism, available in PDF and CSV.
Code to be added:
To Template:Designation/text (add below the last entry):
|NATIONAL CULTURAL HERITAGE OF PERU = [[Cultural Heritage of Peru]]To Template:Designation/colour (add below the last entry):
|NATIONAL CULTURAL HERITAGE OF PERU = #FFE978To Template:Designation/colour2 (add below the last entry):
|NATIONAL CULTURAL HERITAGE OF PERU = #CC3333Once these are in place, please tag me and I will update Template:Designation/Supported designations accordingly. JustEMV (talk) 00:04, 17 July 2025 (UTC)
Template-protected edit request on 26 July 2025
[edit]To the administrator: Please add the codes:
|SOUTH AFRICAN HERITAGE RESOURCES AGENCY|SAHRA = National heritage sites
In Template:Designation/colour:
|SAHRA|SOUTH AFRICAN HERITAGE RESOURCES AGENCY = #FFC0CB
In Template:Designation/colour2:
|SAHRA|SOUTH AFRICAN HERITAGE RESOURCES AGENCY = #DC4333
Axxter99 (talk) Axxter99 (talk) 09:20, 26 July 2025 (UTC)
Edit request 2 August 2025: Additional callnames for 'National Cultural Heritage of Peru' designation
[edit]This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Thank you again to @Pppery: for implementing the original request!
As a follow-up, I realized I forgot to include additional callnames. Could the following aliases please be added to improve consistency and usability?
|NATIONAL CULTURAL HERITAGE OF PERU|CULTURAL HERITAGE OF PERU|PCN|PERU = [[Cultural Heritage of Peru]]|NATIONAL CULTURAL HERITAGE OF PERU|CULTURAL HERITAGE OF PERU|PCN|PERU = #FFE978|NATIONAL CULTURAL HERITAGE OF PERU|CULTURAL HERITAGE OF PERU|PCN|PERU = #CC3333Thanks in advance to any editor who can assist! JustEMV (talk) 15:05, 2 August 2025 (UTC)
Template-protected edit request on 18 August 2025
[edit]This edit request to Template:Designation/text has been answered. Set the |answered= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Add this to Designation/text
|ARCHAEOLOGICAL PROTECTED MONUMENT OF SRI LANKA|APMSL = [[Archaeological Protected Monuments in Sri Lanka|Archaeological Protected Monument of Sri Lanka]]
★ Ttheek ⏵ 09:04, 18 August 2025 (UTC)
- This has been done. GauchoDude (talk) 12:35, 19 August 2025 (UTC)
Edit request 14 November 2025
[edit]This edit request to Template:Designation/text, Template:Designation/colour and Template:Designation/colour2 has been answered. Set the |answered= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Description of suggested change: Propose adding Vietnam's Special National Site as a heritage designation template. Here's a list of sites that are eligible, published by the Vietnamese government.
Diff:
|SPECIAL NATIONAL SITE OF VIETNAM|VIETNAM SPECIAL NATIONAL SITE = [[Special National Sites (Vietnam)|Special National Site of Vietnam]]
|SPECIAL NATIONAL SITE OF VIETNAM|VIETNAM SPECIAL NATIONAL SITE = #FFE978
|SPECIAL NATIONAL SITE OF VIETNAM|VIETNAM SPECIAL NATIONAL SITE = #FF0000
Yaaaaargh! (talk) 15:34, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
Question: How many of these sites actually have articles? You have linked to a list but not one on wikipedia... Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 07:03, 3 December 2025 (UTC)
- Apparently there does exist a list of them on Wikipedia, but only half of the entries actually have articles...
- Even then though, there is still a significant amount of them that it should probably warrant its' own designation entry Yaaaaargh! (talk) 10:26, 3 December 2025 (UTC)
- Please give an example of one article that uses, or could use, {{Infobox historic site}}, which which {{Designation}} is associated. – Jonesey95 (talk) 01:23, 4 December 2025 (UTC)
- This article might be a suitable one Yaaaaargh! (talk) 03:55, 4 December 2025 (UTC)
- There is no indication on that page that the site is designated in any way. All you had to do was provide one good example. I am marking this request as answered until there is a demonstrated need for this change. – Jonesey95 (talk) 17:40, 4 December 2025 (UTC)
- This article might be a suitable one Yaaaaargh! (talk) 03:55, 4 December 2025 (UTC)
- Please give an example of one article that uses, or could use, {{Infobox historic site}}, which which {{Designation}} is associated. – Jonesey95 (talk) 01:23, 4 December 2025 (UTC)