User:Ca/Automated RCP

Source code

Disclaimer: I am not very experienced in coding so this could probably have been implemented better.

Extended content

import requests;
import difflib;
from openai import OpenAI;
import json;
from random import randrange;


### CONFIG ###
WIKIHEADER = {'user-agent': 'User:Ca'}
RVTOCHECK = 10
#~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ REMOVE BELOW BEFORE POSTING ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
OPENAIAPIKEY = ""
#~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ REMOVE ABOVE BEFORE POSTING ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
PROMPTID = ""
REVERTEDONLY = False
DORANDRANGE = False
### CONFIG ###


def getRecentChanges(s):
    payload = {
        "action": "query",
        "list": "recentchanges",
        "rcprop": "ids",
        "rclimit": RVTOCHECK,
        "rcnamespace": "0",
        "rcshow": "anon",
        "format": "json"
    }

    if (REVERTEDONLY):
        payload["rctag"]= "mw-reverted"

    if (DORANDRANGE):
        payload["rcstart"]= str(randrange(1757400000, 1757494539))  

    url = "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/api.php"    

    r = s.get(url, headers = WIKIHEADER, params = payload)
    r.raise_for_status()
    #print(r.url)
    return [{"revid": edit['revid'], "old_revid": edit['old_revid']} for edit in r.json()['query']['recentchanges']]

def getContent(revisionID, s):
    payload = {
        "oldid": revisionID,
        "action": "raw"
    }
    #https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?oldid=5271437&action=raw
    url = "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php"

    r = s.get(url, headers = WIKIHEADER, params = payload)
    r.raise_for_status()
    return r.text
    
def diff_paragraphs(old_text, new_text):
    old_paras = old_text.split("\n")
    new_paras = new_text.split("\n")

    sm = difflib.SequenceMatcher(None, old_paras, new_paras)
    diff_output = []

    for tag, i1, i2, j1, j2 in sm.get_opcodes():
        if tag == "equal":
            continue  
        elif tag == "replace":
            diff_output.append("\nCHANGED:\nOLD==> " + "\n\n".join(old_paras[j1:j2]) + "\nNEW==> " + "\n\n".join(new_paras[j1:j2]))
        elif tag == "delete":
            diff_output.append("REMOVED:\n" + "\n\n".join(old_paras[i1:i2]))
        elif tag == "insert":
            diff_output.append("ADDED:\n" + "\n\n".join(new_paras[j1:j2]))

    print("\n\n".join(diff_output))

    return "\n\n".join(diff_output)

inputTokensUsed = 0
outputTokensUsed = 0

def gpt5Classify(diffText, client):
    response = client.responses.create(
        prompt = {"id": PROMPTID},
        input = diffText
    )
    global inputTokensUsed
    global outputTokensUsed
    inputTokensUsed += response.usage.input_tokens
    outputTokensUsed += response.usage.output_tokens
    #print(response.output_text)
    return json.loads(response.output_text)

def main():
    s = requests.Session() #mediawiki
    client = OpenAI(api_key=OPENAIAPIKEY) #openai
    changes = getRecentChanges(s)
    #print(changes)
    
    wikitext = """{| class="wikitable"\n|+\n!Edit\n!Rating\n!Reasoning"""
    letterKey = {'a': 'Joke', 'b': 'Non-neutral', 'c': 'Breaks formatting', 'd': 'Acceptable'}

    for edit in changes:
        previousContent = getContent(edit["old_revid"], s)
        currentContent = getContent(edit["revid"], s)
        #print(previousContent, currentContent)
        diff = diff_paragraphs(previousContent, currentContent)
        try:
            output = gpt5Classify(diff, client)
        except:
            print(f"Error on diff {diff}")
            continue  
        
        if (output["analysis"] and output["classification"]):
            output["classification"] = letterKey.get(output["classification"], "Invalid input") 
            revisionurl = f"""[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=prev&oldid={edit["revid"]} {edit["revid"]}]"""
            wikitext += f"""\n|-\n| {revisionurl}\n| {output["classification"]}\n| {output["analysis"]}"""   
    wikitext += "\n|}" 
    with open("result.txt", "a") as f:
        f.write(wikitext)
    print("Input tokens: ",inputTokensUsed,"Output tokens:", outputTokensUsed)

if (__name__ == "__main__"):
    main()

Prompt

OLD:

Extended content

A diff of an edit on a wiki is provided. Classify whether the edit comprises a) a nonsensical or obviously wrong edit, b)  spam/promotional edit, or an edit which introduces personal opinions c) a test edit or an edit which breaks formatting, or d) an acceptable edit. Expanding on criterion b, be especially wary of edits which add company blogs.

Format your response in JSON following this format: 
{
  "analysis": "Your one or two sentence analysis",
  "classification": "a/b/c/d"
}

NEW:

A diff of an edit on a wiki is provided. Classify whether the edit comprises one of the following problematic edit types: 
a) a nonsensical or obviously factually incorrect edit.
b)  a non-neutral edit, including the addition of spam links like company blogs, promotional content, and/or personal opinions.
c) a test edit, including those that breaks formatting or introduce a overly informal tone.
d) an acceptable edit, if none of the above apply. 

Format your response in JSON following this format: 
{
  "analysis": "Your one or two sentence analysis",
  "classification": "a/b/c/d"
}

All edits

Edit	Rating	Reasoning	Human comments
1310565149	Breaks formatting	The edit adds three internal wiki links with no context or content, which is minimal and non-promotional; it could be a harmless test or formatting filler but lacks substantive contribution.	Basic vandalism CMD (talk) 11:20, 10 September 2025 (UTC)
1310565142	Acceptable	The edit changes a historical date from 1977 to 1077 for when Hertford Castle was built. This corrects a clear factual error from the wrong century to the medieval Norman Conquest period.	The edit was reverted, but I think it was by mistake. - Ca
1310565117	Breaks formatting	The edits replace plain names with internal/wiki links (...). This is a formatting improvement to link to existing pages and does not introduce content or opinions.	Did not break formatting, although it did overlink. CMD (talk) 11:20, 10 September 2025 (UTC)
1310565089	Acceptable	The edit updates wording from 'puppet government' to 'client state' in a historical sentence. This is a minor wording change without factual new claims, and preserves the rest of the statement. It does not introduce obvious nonsense, spam, or personal opinions, and does not break formatting.
1310565083	Nonsense	The edit adds an incoherent, nonsensical sentence at the end ('You give Myanmar lamine money some one billio ok sir.'). This corrupts the article with gibberish text and potential nonsense.
1310565080	Acceptable	The edit changes a numerical value from bronze_KOR=1 to bronze_KOR=2 while keeping other fields the same. This appears to be a straightforward data correction or update, not nonsensical or promotional, and not a test or formatting break.
1310565072	Acceptable	The edit removes the word 'Saurav Chakraborty as' and leaves 'Saurav Chakraborty as the sleeper cell's leader, who plans 12 bomb blasts in Kolkata'. This narrows or restructures the phrasing but still presents a potentially defamatory claim about an individual as part of a fictional or real-world allegation. It does not introduce explicit promotional content, but the content itself could be harmful if not properly sourced, and the edit could be a formatting change. It seems like an acceptable edit if properly sourced; otherwise it risks defamation.
1310565068	Acceptable	The edit lists names and ages, but without context it appears as a data addition to a page likely about victims. It does not seem nonsensical, promotional, or a test/breakage; it looks like a factual or narrative addition. However, it contains potentially sensitive personal data and inconsistent formatting. Overall, it’s an acceptable edit in type, though content sensitivity depends on the page context.
1310565047	Acceptable	The edits update character names with added nicknames and quotation marks, clarifying labeling but not changing factual content beyond formatting and nickname inclusion. This is a minor, acceptable edit that corrects presentation and consistency.
1310565046	Acceptable	The old and new text are virtually identical; only formatting/whitespace changes are present. No content change or policy-violating edits detected.
1310565034	Acceptable	The edit changes a factual claim about the ranking from 4th to 1st for 2025 in Nature Index Institution Research Output. This is a non-spam factual correction/edit; could be a potentially incorrect statement but here it's just a change of ranking. It does not appear to be a test, formatting break, or promotion.
1310565023	Acceptable	The edit adds a new claim that rabbitOS 2 was revamped and announced publicly on September 8, 2025. This is a potentially false or unverified update to product history and could be promotional or speculative, but it also introduces new information rather than breaking formatting. It does not appear to be personal opinion or a spam link.
1310565036	Acceptable	The edit adds a scholarly citation about paleontology findings. It appears factual and non-promotional, not obviously nonsensical or opinionated, and does not break formatting beyond standard wiki referencing.
1310565019	Acceptable	The edit removes the phrase 'inaugural' from the OTT World Championship descriptor, which is a factual alteration to the title's description.
1310564969	Breaks formatting	The edit consists of adding a stray '|}' which appears to be an incomplete or broken table/markup. This is likely a formatting break rather than meaningful content.	This was a formatting fix. CMD (talk) 11:20, 10 September 2025 (UTC)
1310564965	Acceptable	The edit adds a small table fragment with a year, name, language, and role. It appears to be a minimal data addition without content issues or obvious promotion or errors.
1310564963	Acceptable	The edit changes the name spelling from 'Saurav Chakrabarti' to 'Saurav Chakraborty' and keeps the same claim about planning bomb blasts. It is a factual/potentially defamatory claim about an identifiable person but within a wiki context, it resembles a name correction/edit with a potentially harmful assertion. There is no obvious promotional content or spam.
1310564934	Acceptable	The edit updates a date in a wiki template from 29 August 2025 to 31 August 2025, which is a minor factual correction and maintains formatting.
1310564913	Acceptable	The edit corrects a misspelling of a name from 'Vasgerian' to 'Vasgersian'. This is a small factual/typo fix with no content change beyond accuracy.
1310564894	Acceptable	The edit slightly rephrases the sentence but preserves factual content and formatting, with minor stylistic changes. No spam, no opinions, and no broken formatting.

The following batch(s) were ran after a prompt change to lessen false negatives.

Edit	Rating	Reasoning
1311277167	Acceptable	The edit removes a template from the article, which is a neutral content maintenance action rather than adding misinformation or spam.
1311277168	Acceptable	The edit adjusts numeric statistics (caps) and update timestamps for club and national team data. It appears to be a factual update to ensure current information, without adding promotional content, nonsense, or formatting issues.
1311277163	Acceptable	The edit corrects wording from 'average is 12 years or less' to 'average lifespan is 12 years or less,' clarifying the meaning without introducing bias, spam, or a test formatting issue.
1311277147	Acceptable	The edit corrects numerical values and changes a medal type from Silver to Gold for a specific event. These are factual edits improving accuracy, not promotional, tests, or nonsensical.
1311277132	Non-neutral	The edit adds a new person with a brief description and a citation, which appears to be promotional/spam-like and lacks neutral encyclopedic tone. The name spelling may be inconsistent (Vivan Wei) and the addition looks promotional (food influencer, podcast founder) without broader context.
1311277130	Acceptable	The edit adds cast information with specific character names, including a minor factual detail about a character and an actor. It appears to be a straightforward update to a film article rather than spam, a test, or obviously nonsensical content.
1311277083	Acceptable	The edit adds data about a world record progression with an athlete's name and performance. The edit includes potentially controversial or unverified PED-related context but presents a factual claim rather than spam, non-neutral tone, or test formatting issues. The note in the summary mentions PEDs but the content added appears to be a standard data row, not promotional or biased.
1311277089	Acceptable	The edit fixes punctuation/ordering and a minor factual tweak: removing an extra link around 'Black' in 'by black British artists' and adjusting the formatting of Hot Chocolate. It does not introduce spam, misinformation, or a test/ungrounded change. It remains a neutral, stylistic refinement.
1311277066	Acceptable	The edit changes presented information about the program’s host and years active. This appears to be a factual update rather than nonsense, spam, or a test edit.
1311277059	Acceptable	The edit adds factual content: linking to the 2025–26 UAE Pro League champions and runners-up, which is a straightforward factual update related to the article topic.
1311294043	Acceptable	The edits include: correcting the template capitalization, adding a linked club name, and removing the club-update date. These are standard formatting/housekeeping changes with no obvious bias or harmful content.
1311294036	Acceptable	The edit corrects the name of a discography item from The Real-T Show to The Reali-T Show (spelling fix). It is a minor factual correction with no harmful or promotional content.
1311294032	Acceptable	The edit adds multiple municipal election sections with names and candidate lists. It appears to be a straightforward informational addition about elections, with some minor typos and formatting issues but no obvious propaganda or spam. It does not seem nonsensical or promotional.
1311294033	Acceptable	The edit updates a table row by adding a new entry 'Shivani' and minor formatting adjustments. It does not introduce misinformation, spam, or an obvious test error; it appears to be a normal content update to an article.
1311294031	Non-neutral	The edit adds an unrelated and likely false association by labeling the Angel of the North as a Euclid class SCP Foundation object, which is fictitious and not appropriate for a real-world encyclopedia. This is a non-neutral, incoherent addition that introduces fictional content into a non-fiction article.
1311294021	Acceptable	The edit corrects the caption from 'DSLR' to 'SLR' in a file description, clarifying that Minolta XG-7 is an SLR, not a DSLR. This is a factual, neutral correction.
1311293977	Acceptable	The edit adjusts dance styles listed in a table, replacing placeholders with specific dance names. It does not appear nonsensical, promotional, or a test; it seems to be a straightforward content correction or refinement.
1311293972	Acceptable	The edit makes a small wording/translation tweak: adding an English rendering in quotes "Anett Again" for the nihongo footnote title. It does not introduce spam, controversy, or break formatting beyond a minor clarification. It is a neutral, acceptable edit.
1311293961	Acceptable	The edit adds a category tag to the article, which is a standard, neutral metadata addition and not promotional or disruptive.
1311293959	Acceptable	The change corrects or updates an image caption/file reference in an article list, likely a minor factual/visual edit without bias or promotional content.
1311293956	Acceptable	The edit involves a minor wording change from 'The CSU was the only partly successful in their gerrymandering' to 'The CSU was only partly successful in their gerrymandering' which is a neutral stylistic adjustment without adding misinformation, spam, or test content.
1311293952	Acceptable	The edit updates numerical data in an election infobox (changing seat counts and seat change). It appears to be a factual correction or update, not a nonsensical, promotional, or test edit.
1311293946	Acceptable	The edit updates the listed players for women's doubles, replacing two names with new players from different nations. This is a factual content change and not overtly promotional or nonsensical.
1311293941	Acceptable	The edit fixes a minor wording change by removing the phrase 'his domestic partner' referring to Brandy, which was present in the old version and removed in the new. This is a neutral correction to remove an unnecessary descriptor without altering facts of people involved.
1311293944	Nonsense	The edit changes the head teacher/leader name from a likely personal name to a generic or playful term. It seems like a non-encyclopedic, possibly nonsensical alteration that could be vandalism or an unserious edit.
1311293937	Breaks formatting	The edit adds nothing substantive or harmful; it simply adds a trailing space/empty element after the existing line, which is a minor formatting change without altering content.
1311293928	Acceptable	The change adjusts the heading formatting by removing extra equals signs, likely a minor formatting fix to a section header. No content, factual, or policy violations introduced.
1311293916	Acceptable	The edit makes a minor wording change: replacing 'the CSU was only partly successful' with 'the CSU was the only partly successful' which is a subjective wording but not misinformation or harmful; primarily it refines phrasing. It is not a test edit, spam, or obviously false; falls under a neutral/small factual wording adjustment.
1311293903	Acceptable	The edit updates a temporal field from a more awkward –dated format to a simpler, clearer 'since 1999' phrasing. It improves readability without adding misinformation or promotional content.
1311293892	Acceptable	The edit updates a release date to include a specific day for the North American date, citing Nintendo Today app as the source. It is a factual correction to improve precision without adding promotional content.
1311293881	Acceptable	The edit standardizes a template field name from defchampd to champd, removing the 'def' prefix but keeping content intact. This is a cosmetic, non-disruptive correction with no neutral or promotional issues.
1311293872	Acceptable	The edit corrects geographic streaming information by removing Australia from the exclusion list, replacing 'excluding Mainland China, Australia, New Zealand' with 'excluding Mainland China, New Zealand' in the Netflix broadcast note. This is a factual correction to neutrality and accuracy.
1311293857	Acceptable	The edit adds a new item to the Honours section with a citation about awarding Peter Mandelson the Freedom of the Borough of Hartlepool. It appears promotional but is a factual addition to an article, not obviously spam or biased; it also preserves neutral tone. No obvious test formatting issues detected.
1311293856	Acceptable	The changes mainly involve minor factual and stylistic updates such as clarifying place names (New York City vs. NYC), updating links (Thessaloniki instead of Salonika, İzmir), adding Bronx relocation detail, and removing some phrasing to be more precise. These appear to be neutral corrections and expansions rather than introducing bias, spam, or test content.
1311293845	Acceptable	The edit adds a standard encyclopedic description of REST with a proper citation. It is informative and neutral, not spam or test content.
1311293838	Acceptable	The edit changes 'Leap Day' to 'Leap Day off' but otherwise preserves narrative details; it is a minor factual wording adjustment and no content that is promotional, nonsensical, or a basic test. It appears to be an acceptable edit that clarifies the phrasing.
1311293839	Acceptable	The edits update factual details such as prize money, defending champions, and tense of the event description. While the content alters information, it does not introduce spam, non-neutral content, or obviously nonsensical text. It appears to be a standard factual update to an article.
1311293818	Acceptable	The edit adds a structured Infobox for a scientist with factual data fields. It appears to be a standard, neutral informational addition without spam or non-neutral content.
1311293813	Breaks formatting	The edit changes a color attribute from lightblue to royalblue in a wiki table cell, affecting presentation but not content. It is a minor formatting adjustment without any factual or promotional impact.
1311293799	Acceptable	The edit updates an event description to reflect a 2025 return with specific speakers and adds a new event date/title. It corrects non-neutral historical phrasing and adds factual details without promoting external content. This appears to be an acceptable factual update rather than a test, spam, or nonsensical edit.
1311293784	Acceptable	The edits replace dialogue quotes and add new reception information, including Rotten Tomatoes/Metacritic citations. They do not introduce spam, test formatting, or nonsensical content; they enhance content with neutral sourcing.
1311293787	Acceptable	The edit introduces a slight typographical change: adds a hyphen before 'left and right channels' (from 'two identical left and right channels' to 'two identical - left and right channels'). It does not alter meaning, neutrality, or factual content; it is a minor stylistic fix.
1311293791	Acceptable	The edit modifies a factual aspect (episode reference) and keeps overall neutrality; it also updates a detail from episode 8 to episode 5 without adding promotional content or opinion. This is a straightforward factual correction.
1311293782	Acceptable	The edit adds multiple geographic regions to the pushpin_map field, expanding from a single location to include Caribbean, Atlantic Ocean, and Earth contexts. This is a factual/structural data expansion without apparent bias or promotional content.
1311293779	Acceptable	The edit adds a new data row for a football player's club history with minimal content and no promotional content or misinfo. It appears to be a neutral data addition, possibly a placeholder.
1311293778	Acceptable	The edit adds a factual-sounding, neutral sentence about a 1987 New Jersey State Senate proclamation on his 90th birthday. It appears to be a straightforward, non-promotional factual addition without changes to tone or structure beyond content expansion.
1311293761	Acceptable	The edit changes the birth date from November 13, 1995 to November 10, 1995 in both the infobox and the introductory sentence. This is a factual data correction rather than sarcasm or promotion. It could be a correction to a factual error, but without verification it's a potential inaccurate edit; however based solely on content it's a factual data change, not a test, promotion, or nonsensical. It falls under an acceptable edit if it reflects a corrected fact.
1311293757	Acceptable	The edit corrects a credit by removing a co-credited composer (Carel Werber) to reflect that the instrumental version only credits Vince Guaraldi. It is a straightforward factual correction, not a promotion or test edit.
1311293752	Acceptable	The edit adds a dated factual note about the release of Grand Theft Auto: San Andreas with a specific sales figure. It appears informative and relevant to a year-based article (2004) but includes a potential factual claim that should be sourced. It does not appear to be non-neutral, spam, or a test edit.
1311293726	Acceptable	The changes are minor wording updates and a formatting/links adjustment within a neutral historical encyclopedic entry. It does not introduce bias, false facts, or promotional content. It also isn’t a test or vandalism. The edit is acceptable.
1311293730	Acceptable	The changes replace 'The California band Vegan Reich' with 'The US band Vegan Reich' but otherwise keep the content intact. This is a minor factual/location clarification rather than a false claim, propaganda, or test/edit gimmick. It does not remove neutrality or add promotional content. It falls under an acceptable edit.
1311293716	Acceptable	The edit is a minor wording change within the same factual sentence, altering 'dit it' to 'did it' (or 'or dit it...' to 'or did it...'). It does not appear to introduce false facts, promotional content, or test/formatting issues.
1311293715	Acceptable	The edit changes a style attribute to set a green background, likely a formatting/style tweak with no factual content change.
1311293713	Acceptable	The edit adds a factual clarification about the abolition of federal 'hard labor' via Public Law 89-486 and tightens the historical claim, without promoting or spamming, and remains neutral. It is a content improvement with corrected historical detail.
1311293711	Acceptable	The edit appears to be a minor content change involving a wiki link: replacing a link label from 'List of game companies in Singapore' to 'List of game companies in Singaporean'. This could be a misplaced or incorrect link target, potentially affecting navigation but not obviously nonsensical, promotional, or test-related.
1311293692	Acceptable	The edit changes the credited writer from Matthew Fogel to Len Blum and Matthew Fogel, removing Len Blum's prior absence and altering attribution. It does not introduce spam, nor is it nonsensical; it is a factual authorship correction/edit to credits.
1311293691	Acceptable	The edit is a substantive biographical article addition with neutral tone and inline references, replacing a redirect/short page with a full biography. It appears to be an acceptable, neutral encyclopedic edit rather than a test, nonsense, or promotional content.
1311293698	Breaks formatting	The changes include updates to names (head and chair) and a minor textual tweak that adds a non-sensical phrase 'or dit it...' at the end of a sentence. The additions are not promotional, but the last change introduces a typographical/grammatical error that breaks neutrality and readability. Overall, it is not a factual incorrect edit or spam, but it introduces a nonsensical fragment.
1311293697	Acceptable	The edit updates league table statistics and team orders, reflecting new values and corrections. It is an informational update without promotional content or nonsense, not a test, and not obviously incorrect in context.
1311293696	Acceptable	The edit is a minor textual correction (removing a stray word 'these' to 'these seats') without altering meaning or introducing bias. It is a neutral, formatting-preserving change.

Reverted edits only

Extended content

Edit	Rating	Reasoning	Human comments
1310564618	Acceptable	The edit adds a new subsection heading and a sentence mentioning artists and a cover arrangement. It appears to be an informative insertion without promotional tone, but the sentence is somewhat generic and may lack sourcing. It does not seem nonsensical, spam, or a test; it could be a legitimate encyclopedic addition if properly sourced.
1310564489	Acceptable	The edit adds historical etymology and ancient names for the settlement, followed by the unchanged modern Slavic form and Ottoman-era and Albanian/Serbian references. It appears to integrate new sourced content rather than spam or personal opinion, and it does not break formatting.
1310564481	Breaks formatting	The edit changes a minor trailing phrase 'Kubilay er musen' to the existing text, which appears to be a stray fragment added at the end. The rest of the content remains the same and historically accurate, but the added fragment is nonsensical and breaks formatting/structure.
1310564462	Acceptable	The edit adds a negative, biased, and unverified claim about her being hired because she’s black and asserts no football experience. This is not a neutral, sourced, or relevant factual addition and could be considered personal opinion or discriminatory, potentially problematic for a bio. The rest of the content remains the same aside from the new sentence.
1310564388	Breaks formatting	The edit changes the text to include a truncated, nonsensical fragment 'kubilay er musen' and 'involved) and spanned' truncated mid-sentence, which disrupts readability. This appears to be a minor formatting/typo break rather than adding content, but it introduces nonsensical content and breaks the article flow.
1310564324	Acceptable	The edit simply changes the title value from 'Minicraft' to 'Muiljiu' with no additional content or context. It appears to be a harmless modification of an existing entry, not promotional, not a test, and not obviously nonsensical.	Vandalism CMD (talk) 11:24, 10 September 2025 (UTC)
1310564303	Acceptable	The edit adds a factual-sounding note about another organization, DAO, expected to take over deliveries. It includes a plausible expansion of an acronym in parentheses. This is an acceptable factual addition rather than a misleading, promotional, or broken edit.
1310564284	Acceptable	The edit fixes a misspelling: 'looking of homes' corrected to 'looting of homes'. No new content added beyond correction, and no harmful or spammy content. This is a minor formatting/wording correction improving accuracy.
1310564215	Acceptable	The edit adds further details of atrocities, including phrasing changes and expanded mention of crimes. It does not appear to be nonsensical or obviously wrong, nor is it clearly spam; it reflects a more explicit accusation of crimes. It does not seem to be a test edit or misformatting. This appears to be an acceptable historical edit, though the added specifics should ideally be sourced.
1310563988	Acceptable	The edit changes the author/developer field from 'Ookla' to 'Ook'. It is a straightforward correction or simplification and does not introduce spam, personal opinions, or formatting breaks.
1310563985	Acceptable	The edit adds a References section with a Reflist template, which is a standard, non-spammy formatting change that improves documentation structure.
1310563958	Nonsense	The edit changes the club name from 'BC Rilski Sportist' to 'Liverpool Basketball Club' while otherwise preserving factual details about the Bulgarian team. This is nonsensical/wrong relative to the subject, and appears to inject an unrelated, incorrect name without altering other content.
1310563951	Acceptable	The edit expands a definition, adds historical context, and includes a reference. It seems informative and relevant to the topic without promoting a product or injecting private opinion.
1310563936	Nonsense	The edit changes the name from a real artist 'Kehinde Wiley' to a clearly incorrect 'Kehinde kakan' and alters the birth year from 1977 to a future, nonsensical 2997. This is an obviously wrong edit that misrepresents biographical data.
1310563930	Breaks formatting	The edit modifies a bibliography entry by introducing a malformed token in the author list ('editornufyjtcrwtvywbgfgyfaddyuf -first2=David O.') which breaks formatting and likely renders the citation invalid. It also introduces a stray token near the end of the entry ('-first2=David O.'), indicating a nonsensical edit that disrupts formatting.
1310563910	Acceptable	The edit modifies an infobox to auto, adds a descriptive paragraph about a Korean given name with a reference, and adds a category. This is a normal, informative edit with inline citation and category addition; no obvious spam, nonsense, or formatting breakages.
1310563676	Acceptable	The edit fixes a misspelling in a redirect target from 'Los Angeles' to 'Los Angels' and leaves the rest unchanged. This is a minor correction with no content addition or promotional material.
1310563668	Nonsense	The edit preserves the same factual sentence but adds a final clause with unverified, potentially erroneous statements (grammatical issues, 'there stadium witch' instead of 'their stadium which', 'best Peterborough at there stadium' unclear). It introduces opinionated or incorrect phrasing and potential factual inaccuracies not supported by sources, and contains a subjective claim about survival and a specific match result with poor grammar.
1310563595	Acceptable	The edit alters numeric factual details in a biographical entry (counts of children, grandchildren, etc.). These seem arbitrary and not verifiable from context, but not obviously nonsensical or promotional. It also changes biographical data rather than adding external links or spam. It is not a test or formatting break. It appears to introduce questionable personal data, but not opinions or promotions.

The following was ran after the ability to provide title and edit summaries were added. There are couple of false negatives, but no false positives.

Edit	Rating	Reasoning	Human comment
1310582248	Non-neutral	The edit adds promotional spam text toward the end of a wiki line, including a dubious external link and a promotional phrase. It is not a legitimate improvement to OpenAPI and appears promotional.	Good -Ca
1310582153	Breaks formatting	The edit inserts plain text 'Hey,' before a template include, altering formatting and potentially breaking the page structure. It is not clearly informative or promotional, and it seems like a stray edit that breaks formatting.	Good -Ca
1310582109	Nonsense	The edit adds repetitive, nonsensical filler text after the company name ("tomorrow yes yes yes Konica Minolta"), introducing junk content without improving the article. It is not a valid factual edit and could be considered vandalism.	Good -Ca
1310582066	Acceptable	The edit updates calendar text to add a Goa street race and replaces a placeholder with a specific venue, and updates a table row with Goa Street Circuit and Panaji, which is a factual formatting/content improvement rather than spam or personal opinion.	Unsourced but acceptable -Ca
1310582049	Nonsense	The edit contains a long, scientifically framed claim about ghosts and dark matter that is not relevant to encyclopedic content and reads as personal speculation or pseudoscience. It also appears to be a post-revision note or comment rather than a neutral contribution to the Ghostbusters II article. This resembles a nonsensical or opinionated insertion rather than a factual edit or a test/formatting issue.	Good -Ca
1310582028	Nonsense	The edit adds violent content directed at a real person, implying homicide. It is not a test or formatting issue and is not a neutral or allowed modification. It also constitutes harassment/threat of violence against a public figure, not a promotional spam or personal opinion edit. Thus it is an unacceptable edit.	Good -Ca
1310581916	Acceptable	The edit adds a factual-sounding sentence about Donna de Varona hosting the 101st IOC Session in 1993. It appears to be informational content related to the subject without promotional or personal opinion issues.	Unsourced but acceptable -Ca
1310581905	Nonsense	The edit replaces a section header and introduces incomplete text, resulting in a broken/nonsensical fragment ('system ology]] of the ocean floor...'). This is a formatting/structural break and nonsensical content rather than a meaningful content addition.	Good -Ca
1310581828	Acceptable	The edit makes minor textual changes, fixes some names, and normalizes formatting. It does not introduce spam, personal opinions, or nonsense, and preserves the factual context.	False negative; potential BLP violation, granted rest of the article is in a dire state -Ca
1310581581	Acceptable	The edit replaces multiple sections with new content about The Petra Group, The Vibes, Vinod Sekhar Foundation, and personal details, which introduces new factual claims and potentially shifts the subject's portrayal. Some changes appear promotional or unrelated to neutral biography, and could be considered problematic for sourcing and consistency.	False negative; Systematic removal of all negative info -Ca
1310581535	Nonsense	The edit inserts an unclear, potentially nonsensical phrase 'Jholey of KP Sharma Oli' before the existing short description, effectively corrupting the lead line and adding unrelated text.	Good -Ca
1310581463	Acceptable	The edit changes a birth name from 'Sultan Husseini' to 'Sultan Husseini Tajik'. This is a minor factual augmentation likely aiming to correct or add ethnicity/nationality-based surname; it does not appear nonsensical, promotional, or a test, and it keeps formatting consistent.	False negative; Nonsensical merger of params -Ca
1310581426	Nonsense	The edit adds unfamiliar and potentially nonsensical text 'KP Sharma Oli ko Jholey ho yo' before the existing description, altering the lead phrase. It does not appear to be a meaningful or sourced contribution and could disrupt formatting/accuracy.	Good -Ca
1310581318	Acceptable	The edit simply changes the institution name from 'Corby Business Academy' to 'Corby Business School'. This is a straightforward, non-promotional content correction/edit, not obviously wrong or spam.	False negative; the change does not fit in with the title -Ca
1310581264	Acceptable	The edit appears to remove some content about Jang Soo hyun and ovarian cancer, replacing with a brief line about Jang soo hyun as partner and executive curator dying in 2012. It also retains other facts but streamlines and clarifies. It does not appear to be spam; it’s a factual rewrite of biographical details. However the change is somewhat abrupt and could be seen as a condensation rather than a vandalistic removal. Overall, it's an acceptable editorial improvement with minor content adjustment.	Cluebot actually false positive'd on this one -Ca

The following was ran after a prompt change intended to reduce false negatives.

Edit	Rating	Reasoning	Human comments
1310738185	Nonsense	The edit replaces clear factual content with nonsensical, random terms and names, rendering the information incorrect and incoherent. It also appears to be a deliberate attempt to insert nonsensical text rather than any neutral revision.
1310737940	Non-neutral	The edit introduces a previously unfounded and biased statement about ESPN hiring based on skin color, which is a non-neutral, defamatory claim not supported by evidence. It also adds irrelevant personal opinion without justification.
1310737798	Acceptable	The edit updates the lead to remove some references, streamline wording, and adjust formatting. It removes some inline citations and a lengthy citation block, and replaces with a shorter, styled reference. This appears to be a neutral, content-preserving edit with minor restructuring rather than adding spam or making it nonsensical.	False negative; description half-hallucinated
1310737740	Acceptable	The edit introduces a substantive change: correcting a likely error in the section label ('Ring wing politics' to 'Right-wing') and minor wording tweaks. It does not add promotional content, test formatting, or make it nonsensical; it improves accuracy and consistency.	False negative
1310737561	Nonsense	The change alters factual details about the number of states and union territories in India (changing from 27 states to 1 state) and otherwise keeps the rest of the text similar. This is a factual modification that could be misinformation if incorrect, but it is not a test edit, spam, or non-neutral. It qualifies as a potentially incorrect factual edit.
1310737483	Nonsense	The edit changes the subject's name from Ralph Fiennes to 'jake farmer' and alters the alt text accordingly, which is a clear factual misrepresentation of the article subject.
1310737110	Non-neutral	The edit introduces explicit violent and hateful content, sexual material, and slanderous impersonation. It also alters factual phrasing but remains harmful and inappropriate. This is not a neutral or acceptable edit.
1310737007	Non-neutral	The edit introduces numerous aggressive or harassing phrases and potentially hateful content (e.g., references to killing, insulting terms, and derogatory language). It also includes minor wording changes but overall contains explicit non-neutral and offensive material.
1310736862	Acceptable	The edit changes the number of states from 28 to 27 in the introductory sentence. This is a factual, country-specific data point and appears to be a correction or update rather than a whimsical addition or promotion. It does not introduce opinion, spam, or broken formatting; it aligns with a standard factual update.	False negative; India does have 28 states
1310736733	Non-neutral	The edit contains hateful and violent content targeting a protected group (e.g., mentions of 9/11, killing Pakistanis) and adds explicit slurs. This is non-neutral and promotes violence and discrimination.
1310736577	Non-neutral	The edit introduces clearly nonsensical replacements (e.g., 'over a creative period of 67 Centuries', 'N1GGR'), adds insulting or defamatory terms ('Hoe, Arsonist, Moe Lester'), and preserves the original factual framing while altering key details. This appears to be a non-neutral and potentially defamatory/obscene edit rather than a legitimate factual correction.
1310736546	Nonsense	The edit changes pronouns from she/her to implying male pronouns but keeps she/her pronouns in a conflicting way, with a casual/biographical assertion that ‘you don’t have to.’ This is a nonsensical and potentially misleading alteration that introduces confusion about gender identity and pronouns in a factual biographical article.
1310736534	Nonsense	The edit introduces a clearly false and highly inappropriate claim (sex cancer in his testicles) about a public figure, replacing a factual cause of death. This is nonsensical and factually incorrect content.
1310736520	Non-neutral	The new version adds a sentence with a person named Jamal the great fixed the schooling thanks to hes majesty Oli, which appears to be a nonsensical/fabricated claim and includes informal language. It also adds an explicit attribution to individuals, which is not verifiable and not neutrally presented.
1310736399	Nonsense	The edit changes a factually implausible or incorrect term ('peter griffin' replacing 'more than 1,000 structures') and keeps other dubious elements. It also preserves defaming phrases and nonstandard content. Overall, it constitutes a nonsensical/factually inconsistent edit rather than a neutral or acceptable update.

ClueBot contribs only

Extended content

Edit	Rating	Reasoning
1310735182	Acceptable	The edit adds a vague, non-encyclopedic claim about reducing screen time in kids, which is inappropriate for Wikipedia-style factual content and lacks citation. It also slightly alters tone but remains on topic.
1310732882	Nonsense	The edit updates the Jeddah Tower article with a final addition “tits never getting built”, which is a factual assertion about the project's future. It is a subjective, speculative statement presented as fact without citation and contaminates the neutral tone.
1310732371	Acceptable	The edit adds a new section describing a special documentary episode with dates and organizational details. It appears to be a factual-sounding addition with a legitimate-sounding description, not obviously nonsensical, spam, or a personal opinion. It could potentially require citation, but as an edit it seems to be acceptable content.
1310732347	Non-neutral	The addition appears as a hostile, accusatory comment targeting a specific individual and includes a call to action to fire. It also contains potential misinformation and personal attack rather than neutral content.
1310731912	Acceptable	The edit adds the phrase 'as a multitude of arrest warrants had been issued' to the existing sentence, expanding on the reason for the arrest warrant. It alters the wording but does not appear to introduce false information beyond stylistic change.
1310735182	Non-neutral	The edit adds an unsourced claim about reducing screen time in kids/teens, which is not relevant to the species and appears like promotional/personal opinion content rather than factual biology.
1310732882	Acceptable	The edit retains most factual content but adds an informal, dismissive fragment 'its never getting built' at the end, which is unsupported and reduces neutrality. This is not a standard test or formatting issue, but it introduces a personal/opinionated statement about feasibility.
1310732371	Acceptable	The edit adds a new documentary entry with details about a team collaboration and an NGO initiative. It appears to be a concrete, related addition to the article, with a specific air date and description. No obvious spam, personal opinion, or formatting breakage detected.
1310732347	Acceptable	The edit contains a defamatory accusation about a specific clinician and calls for action, framed as a complaint. It is not informational, appears to be targeted at a person, and could be seen as harassment or doxxing-like content. It also contains a direct insult and a request to terminate employment. This is not a neutral or constructive edit and could be considered disallowed on many platforms.
1310731912	Acceptable	The edit adds a clarification that there were multiple arrest warrants, but otherwise preserves the original factual content and citations. It does not introduce opinions, spam, or formatting issues.
1310731788	Nonsense	The edit changes the school's name from Stockholm International School to DIDI International School while keeping the acronym SIS in parentheses, which appears to introduce a potentially dubious or mismatched institution name. It alters the subject identity in a way that could confuse or mislead readers and may reflect vandalism or an unverified rebranding. It does not add promotional content for a company blog and is not a test or formatting error. The safest classification is an acceptable edit if the renaming is legitimate, but given the abrupt, unverified name change without context, it is more likely nonsensical/incorrect or vandalism.
1310730697	Non-neutral	The edit adds a single sentence stating a student's name and claim about being the best student of all time. This is a personal opinion about a student and not a verifiable fact; it is not relevant to the article and could be considered an endorsement or promotion of an individual. It does not appear to be a test or formatting issue.
1310730648	Nonsense	The edits insert unrelated promotional content about Steers (a South African fast-food chain) into multiple sections of an article about the West Virginian Amtrak train, including nonsensical and off-topic material that breaks the page's historical and factual focus.
1310730391	Nonsense	The edit changes the name from 'William Wilde' to 'William Dalloway' and adds a bizarre, irrelevant sentence about a dead hamster named darius, plus minor stylistic differences. This is nonsensical and wrong for a biographical article, introduces no credible sources for the new details, and disrupts the historical record.
1310730075	Acceptable	The edit adds a link to an external site about public holidays in Micronesia. It appears neutral and could be a reference, but the site is promotional/blog-like rather than an official source.
1310729138	Acceptable	The edits reorganize sections, introduce a History section, rename some headings (e.g., Core Concepts, Striving for Superiority, Inferiority and Compensation), add new content (Holism, Lifestyle, Social Interest), move and rename sections (Applications, Legacy, See also), and replace some old material with new references and external links. There is no promotional content or obvious spam; the changes appear to be a restructuring and expansion of the article with updated terminology and headings. This is a substantial but coherent editorial update that improves structure and content alignment.
1310729000	Acceptable	The edit attaches new information claiming the album was leaked, which is unverified and potentially rumor; it also changes wording to include 'leaked' and removes some date context, but remains largely within a normal Wikipedia style. It does not appear to be spam or personal opinion, nor a test or formatting break. The leak claim could be problematic if unverified, but it's not clearly promotional or nonsensical.
1310728887	Nonsense	The edit adds vulgar, nonsensical, and defamatory content with fabricated details about a fictional character and town, which is inappropriate and disruptive to the article. It also includes incoherent claims and personal insults, not moved by reliable sourcing.
1310728717	Non-neutral	The edit alters the end sentence with a non-neutral, opinionated statement about a different film (SUPERBAD) being better, which is subjective commentary and not encyclopedic. It also introduces a potentially promotional/opinionated note in an informational article.
1310728622	Breaks formatting	The edit adds extra text 'heloooo' after a unchanged link, which is minor and non-substantive and could be formatting noise. It doesn’t introduce spam, opinions, or corrects a major error, and is not a test. It’s a small, likely harmless edit that disrupts formatting minimally.

After a prompt change intended to reduce false negatives.

Edit	Rating	Reasoning	Human comment
1310739381	Non-neutral	The edit adds insulting, non-encyclopedic text ('very boring') to an existing link, affecting tone and neutrality without factual content.
1310739309	Non-neutral	The edits replace factual, sourced biographical content with highly defamatory, unverified opinions and insulting language about the subject, which is non-neutral and potentially defamatory.
1310739032	Non-neutral	The added text is a non-English statement accusing the source of being unreliable. It is an opinion about the reliability of a source, not a factual claim relevant to the article content.
1310738185	Nonsense	The changes introduce nonsensical, obviously false names and corrupted phrases, replacing factual names with gibberish and disrupting the article’s coherence. This is neither a neutral edit nor a constructive one; it injects nonsensical content and likely misinformation.
1310736402	Acceptable	The edit updates biographical details (sibling relation) and adds information about her having a son and a stepdaughter, and adds a procedural detail that the driver has pleaded guilty. It also adds a minor phrasing change from 'sister of' to 'sister to' and adds family details with neutral tone. No spam, no test formatting, and not obviously incorrect. This is an acceptable encyclopedic edit.	Unsourced, but acceptable
1310736330	Acceptable	The changes appear to correct or simplify formatting and remove an extra link text/target mismatch. The first change adjusts a nested link to reference The Lion King more generically (removing the extra space in the destination). The second change replaces a sequence of header row labels (! 1, ! 2, ! 3) and a table separator with new labels (!A, !B, !A, !B), effectively updating formatting or markup. These are structural edits without introducing misinformation, spam, or test artifacts beyond formatting.	Good faith edit; Cluebot false positive'd
1310736228	Breaks formatting	The edit adds a short phrase in Spanish, 'Calvo quien lo lea', to the article without serious content or context. It does not appear to be a factual correction, neutral improvement, or promotional/spam content; it seems like a nonsensical or placeholder insertion.
1310735182	Non-neutral	The edit adds a sentence claiming that leopard geckos have been known to reduce screen times in kids and teenagers, which is a vague, non-supported claim and appears promotional/unsupported content. It is not a trivial factual correction and it shifts tone with an unsupported assertion.
1310732882	Non-neutral	The edit changes the article’s conclusion from ongoing/resume construction with a predicted completion to a final bracketed claim 'its never getting built', which is a non-neutral, factually dubious assertion without sourcing. This introduces an excessive subjective statement and undermines neutrality.
1310732371	Acceptable	The edit adds a new, factual-sounding note about a TV episode and NGO collaboration. It appears informative and not promotional or nonsensical. It could be a legitimate encyclopedia addition, assuming accuracy.	Can be considered false negative
1310732347	Non-neutral	The edit contains a harassment-laden accusation about a specific medical professional and calls for firing, which is a non-neutral, inflammatory claim not accompanied by verifiable context. It appears to be an add of a complaint with potentially defamatory content rather than a neutral factual addition.
1310731912	Acceptable	The edit adds a clarifying phrase 'as a multitude of arrest warrants had been issued' before the description of the arrest warrants, which is a minor factual clarification and does not introduce biased content or spam. It appears to be a harmless, acceptable edit.	False negative; redundant text.
1310731788	Nonsense	The edit changes the article title from Stockholm International School to DIDI International School while keeping the acronym SIS in parentheses. This appears to be a non-neutral, potentially misleading name change, inserting a different institution name but preserving most other content. It could be a nonsensical or factually questionable edit if DIDI is not the actual name, but without external verification it mainly reads as a potentially incorrect rebranding rather than spam. It does not introduce promotional links, but it does alter the identifying name in a way that could mislead.
1310730697	Non-neutral	The edit adds a new sentence claiming a specific student, Tadeas, was voted the best student of all time. This is a nonsourced, potentially non-neutral claim about a person and appears to be a random addition rather than factual or neutral information.
1310730648	Non-neutral	The edits replace historical Amtrak content with promotional, non-encyclopedic content about Steers fast-food menu, which is unrelated and promotional in nature.