User talk:175.45.116.95

February 2016

Hello, I'm I dream of horses. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Jindabyne, New South Wales— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. I dream of horses If you reply here, please ping me by adding {{U|I dream of horses}} to your message. (talk to me) (My edits) @ 01:38, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at AK-103. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. - BilCat (talk) 01:38, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at AK-103, you may be blocked from editing.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: AK-103 was changed by 175.45.116.95 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.93023 on 2016-02-05T01:40:31+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 01:40, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further notice the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to AK-103. I dream of horses If you reply here, please ping me by adding {{U|I dream of horses}} to your message. (talk to me) (My edits) @ 01:44, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

{{subst:uw-4im|AK-103}} - BilCat (talk) 01:52, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistent vandalism. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. m.o.p 02:01, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Yuraygir NP (June 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by LaMona was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

References must be in-line with the text they support. See wp:Refbegin for how to format them. Also, look at wp:SMOS for information about formatting headings and the document generally.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Yuraygir NP and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

LaMona (talk) 15:05, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! 175.45.116.95, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! LaMona (talk) 15:05, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Recent edit to Alex Blackwell (cricketer)

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that you removed some content from Alex Blackwell (cricketer) without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Materialscientist (talk) 10:44, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

February 2017

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Alex Blackwell (cricketer), without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Stikkyy (talk) 21:57, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove content, templates, or other materials to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Alex Blackwell (cricketer), you may be blocked from editing. Jim1138 (talk) 22:35, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Conflict of interest notice

Hello, 175.45.116.95. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places, or things you have written about in the article Alex Blackwell (cricketer), you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic, and it is important when editing Wikipedia articles that such connections be completely transparent. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. In particular, we ask that you please:

avoid editing or creating articles related to you and your family, friends, school, company, club, or organization, as well as any competing companies' projects or products;
instead, you are encouraged to propose changes on the Talk pages of affected article(s) (see the {{request edit}} template);
when discussing affected articles, disclose your COI (see WP:DISCLOSE);
avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or to the website of your organization in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
exercise great caution so that you do not violate Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Please take a few moments to read and review Wikipedia's policies regarding conflicts of interest, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing and autobiographies. Thank you. Jim1138 (talk) 22:40, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia content

Wikipedia goes by what wp:reliable sources and wp:policy state. This is article is on Wikimedia servers, and content is dictated by policy, not Blackwell. Do not remove sourced content. If you see a policy-related problem with content, use a wp:edit request on talk:Alex Blackwell (cricketer). Editing the article Alex Blackwell (cricketer) itself is not advisable given your COI. Thank you Jim1138 (talk) 22:40, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

NPOV Warning

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, you may be blocked from editing. —Formal Dude (talk) 04:47, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This is a shared IP address

Please note that this is a shared IP address and that the user of this IP address in March 2017 who made legitimate changes to 'Buddhism and Christianity' is not the same user who had used this ip address to vandalize wikipedia pages with racist comments in february 2016, or the one that edited a cricketer`s article in february 2017. Therefore there is no point in calling all the three different users vandals, or acussing them of continuous disruptive editing. Please also check your own neutral point of view as well. 210.7.24.147 (talk) 12:44, 26 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.