User talk:Coelentrata

Welcome!

Hi Coelentrata! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! _signed,Rosguill ^talk 14:56, 11 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for you greetings,

hopefully i am now understanding how it's work and further if any help needs I will glad to refer you. Coelentrata (talk) 15:04, 11 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to the region of South Asia (India, Pakistan, Afghanistan, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh and Nepal), broadly construed, including but not limited to history, politics, ethnicity, and social groups, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia's norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have an expanded level of powers and discretion in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
follow editorial and behavioural best practices;
comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
refrain from gaming the system.

Additionally, you must be logged in, have 500 edits, and have an account age of 30 days in order to make edits related to two subtopics: (1) Indian military history, or (2) social groups, explicitly including caste associations and political parties related to India, Pakistan, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh and Nepal.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures, you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

While the above is a standard notice, I do want to draw attention to two issues with your edits thus far: 1) you have made many edits to Indian social group topics, which you are not yet allowed to do per the ARBCOM decision described in the above notice 2) you have described several of your edits as addressing Grammer, and in doing so introduced grammatical errors (as well as demonstrating that you don't know how to spell "grammar"). Examples include Special:Diff/1310763836, Special:Diff/1310772275, and Special:Diff/1310768255. Please do not attempt to do grammatical fixes if you are not fully versed in English grammar, as appears to be the case. In a similar vein, in Special:Diff/1310770284 you added a giant image that makes the page impossible to read. Please take more care in editing and ensure that you are actually improving the articles you edit. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 15:02, 11 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Okay from now I will avoid editing pages related to social groups and also from now Grammar should be appropriate. Coelentrata (talk) 15:09, 11 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The spelling of "grammar" is not the issue. The issue is that you keep adding grammatical errors when you think you are fixing grammar. In this edit and this edit and this edit and this edit and this edit and this edit and this edit you have introduced grammatical errors to text that was perfectly fine before you changed it. It does not appear that you are sufficiently fluent in English grammar to be making grammatical changes. It is disrespectful of other editors for you to be making changes like this, which other editors must spend their time to fix. I just spent 10 minutes of my time reviewing and fixing your seven incorrect changes. Please stop making grammatical changes if you cannot do them correctly. CodeTalker (talk) 04:59, 12 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@CodeTalker It's my fault, I am working on my grammar and from now grammar would be correctly added to articles, Thanks. Coelentrata (talk) 06:07, 12 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kakrahta (September 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MCE89 was:

We're sorry, but we cannot accept blank submissions. If in fact you did include text within the article, but it isn't showing, please make sure that any extra text above your entry is removed, as it may be causing it to hide and not be shown to the reviewer.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Kakrahta and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

MCE89 (talk) 08:44, 14 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Coelentrata! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! MCE89 (talk) 08:44, 14 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I am not disappointed at all, I understand reason behind decline and want to work on it by providing proper information about articles with references if possible.Thanks Coelentrata (talk) 03:46, 15 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Coelentrata, your editing suggestions are on the way

SuggestBot is making a list of articles that you might like to edit. You will receive these suggestions soon. In the meantime, you might be interested in checking out the following WikiProjects. If you're interested in a project, feel free to add yourself to the member list and introduce yourself on the project talk page!

wikiproject_India (project page, talk page)

Please do not remove AfC templates Draft:Kakrahta

Hello, I'm Thilio. I noticed you removed the Articles for Creation submission template from Draft:Kakrahta. Please don’t remove this template as it is needed for the AfC review process if you’ve improved the draft you can resubmit by clicking the Resubmit button at the top of the page. Thanks Thilio^{R O B O T🤖 talk} 11:02, 16 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks@Thilio I am unaware of it. Coelentrata (talk) 11:04, 16 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kakrahta (September 16)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by RangersRus was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Kakrahta and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

RangersRus (talk) 18:01, 16 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Okay @RangersRus Thanks to pointing out the problem, I will definitely work on it. Coelentrata (talk) 04:53, 17 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively as a sockpuppet of User:GhoshThakur per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/GhoshThakur. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse. In addition, your ability to edit your talk page has also been revoked.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.

Girth Summit _(blether) 19:27, 20 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Administrator use only:

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.