User talk:Harold Foppele

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing! Bryan MacKinnon (talk) 06:06, 8 September 2025 (UTC)

User:Rambley

Your submission at Articles for creation: Quantum beams inside a spherical volume has been accepted

Quantum beams inside a spherical volume, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 23% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

monkey_smashing^keyboards (talk) 17:08, 4 December 2025 (UTC)

Nomination of Quantum beams inside a spherical volume for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Quantum beams inside a spherical volume is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Quantum beams inside a spherical volume until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Tercer (talk) 09:20, 5 December 2025 (UTC)

" There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Ldm1954 (talk) 13:27, 5 December 2025 (UTC)"

• Delete I withdraw the article but contest WP:OR agree with wrong title. Harold Foppele (talk) 13:34, 5 December 2025 (UTC)

December 2025

Please do not attack other editors, as you did at User talk:Monkeysmashingkeyboards. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. Ldm1954 (talk) 14:03, 5 December 2025 (UTC)

• If I remember correctly, you are the one that started a personal discussion previously and that was not cool. Harold Foppele (talk) 14:12, 5 December 2025 (UTC)

  Hi Harold Foppele. I see there is a discussion about blocking you from page creations at WP:ANI the admin's noticbaord (incidents) (noted above).

  Would you agree to voluntarily take a long break, say two years, from creating pages (including articles and drafts)? I think you are struggling with WP:OR at the moment, and sources will only accumulate in the break. Creating a new article is possibly the hardest task in Wikipedia (and fraught with danger, as you have learned). It doesn't hurt to get very familiar with the policies and guidelines by editing existing articles for an extended time first. I have seen the analogy: if you wanted to build a house or a car, would you start by trying to build a house or a car, or would you first learn the essential skills and knowledge?

  If you look under the hood, current Wikipedia articles are in desperate need of attention.

  Is my proposal reasonable to you? Commander Keane (talk) 15:25, 5 December 2025 (UTC)

Blocked from creating pages

After reviewing your editing history, the discussions on this page, and Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Requesting page creation block of User:Harold Foppele, I have blocked you from new page creation. If you wish to appeal this block, please read Wikipedia:Appealing a block. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 17:07, 5 December 2025 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Hello Harold Foppele! The thread you created at the Teahouse, Quantum Beams, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please . See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by KiranBOT, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=KiranBOT}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). —KiranBOT (talk) 03:11, 6 December 2025 (UTC)