User talk:OpenKey2195

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

OpenKey2195 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hello, my previous username was "Sparkrock," which I now understand violated Wikipedia's username policy because it looked like a company account. My current username "OpenKey2195" was chosen as a random combination of words and numbers and does not represent an organization or group. OpenKey2195 (talk) 18:54, 17 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Accept reason:

I have unblocked your account. Welcome back. PhilKnight (talk) 21:39, 17 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

.

(Non-administrator comment) Please confirm that you have reviewed and understood both Wikipedia's conflict of interest guidelines and paid editing disclosure policy. You may be allowed to contribute indirectly about your employer, either through edit requests to existing articles or the Articles for Creation process for new articles. But it would helpful to know if you are willing to edit other topic areas where you have no conflict of interest. --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 19:34, 17 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I have read and understand Wikipedia's conflict of interest guidelines and paid editing disclosure policy. I do intend to edit other topics areas where I do not have potential conflicts of interest.OpenKey2195 (talk) 18:54, 17 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Sparkrock

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Sparkrock, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
The page exhibits one or more of the following signs which indicate that the page could only plausibly have been generated by large language models (LLM) and would have been removed by any reasonable human review:

Communication intended for the user: This may include collaborative communication (e.g., "Here is your Wikipedia article on..."), knowledge-cutoff disclaimers (e.g., "Up to my last training update ..."), self-insertion (e.g., "as a large language model"), and phrasal templates (e.g., "Smith was born on [Birth Date].")
Implausible non-existent references: This may include external links that are dead on arrival, ISBNs with invalid checksums, and unresolvable DOIs. Since humans can make typos and links may suffer from link rot, a single example should not be considered definitive. Editors should use additional methods to verify whether a reference truly does not exist.
Nonsensical citations: This may include citations of incorrect temporality (e.g a source from 2020 being cited for a 2022 event), DOIs that resolve to completely unrelated content (e.g., a paper on a beetle species being cited for a computer science article), and citations that attribute the wrong author or publication.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. —pythoncoder (talk | contribs) 13:36, 18 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions!

You may have used a large language model (LLM), such as ChatGPT, in your edits. While using LLMs can be very useful, machine-generated text—much like human-created text—can contain errors or flaws, or be outright useless (see WP:LLM). Specifically, asking an LLM to "write a Wikipedia article" can sometimes cause the output to be outright fabrication, complete with fictitious references. It may be biased, may libel living people, or violate copyrights. Thus, editors should verify all LLM-generated text before using it in an article. Please prioritize manual contributions and thorough research when editing. If you are unsure about your wording, an alternative is to suggest it on the talk page for another volunteer to look at it. If you are creating a new article, you may find it help to use Articles for Creation process, where you can receive feedback on your work.

As you get started editing Wikipedia, you may find the pages below to be helpful:

If you still have questions, there is the Teahouse, or you can click here to ask a question on your talk page, and someone will be along to answer it shortly. In your messages, please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and a timestamp. Happy editing! Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 13:47, 18 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I did not use an LLM for my edits. I wrote that myself. I have followed the rules and my page still got deleted. OpenKey2195 (talk) 13:48, 18 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

September 2025

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to Draft:Sparkrock. This has been done because the Draft namespace is the preferred location for Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. Fancy Refrigerator ^(talk) 16:25, 18 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sparkrock (September 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Qcne was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sparkrock and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

qcne (talk) 16:42, 18 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, OpenKey2195! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! qcne (talk) 16:42, 18 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @OpenKey2195. Thank you for the paid editing disclosure. I should have added another decline to the above: I am not convinced you've proven how the company meets Wikipedia:Criteria for inclusion (organizations and companies). qcne (talk) 16:43, 18 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]