User talk:Postmaster12

This is Postmaster12's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: CAM (December 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Dan arndt were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:CAM and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 01:22, 13 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Postmaster12! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Dan arndt (talk) 01:22, 13 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:CAM

Hello, Postmaster12. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:CAM, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:07, 20 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Logo update request

Here's the proposed image It's looks more modern and reflects its identity of 2025 Postmaster12 (talk) 23:04, 5 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Warner logo by Saul Bass sans text.svg

Postmaster12 (talk) 11:05, 6 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

June 2025

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Nickelodeon Kids' Choice Awards. Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use your sandbox. Thank you. Magitroopa (talk) 23:14, 5 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I've clarified your edit and restored it with a couple of tweaks, and apologize for the above user, who has been warned that others are allowed to contribute to this article equally. I also apologize personally if this scared you from further contribution here. Nathannah • 📮 00:25, 6 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I was just thinking they should bring the kaleidoscope award back along with the blimp Postmaster12 (talk) 10:39, 6 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Please note that Wikipedia is not the place to add your personal ideas/thoughts into articles, such as awards you want given out for an awards ceremony, or changing logos on articles to ones you want to be used as opposed to the correct information. Continuing to do these kinds of edits may soon lead to a block. Magitroopa (talk) 15:05, 6 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia. Same as above- this is not the place to edit your own wishes into, whether it be awards you want given out, or old logos you want to be used by companies. This is highly disruptive. Magitroopa (talk) 15:57, 6 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Award update request for a award ceremony

I did a edit on Nickelodeon Kids’ Choice Awards saying that kaleidoscope and orange blimp is present Postmaster12 (talk) 23:26, 5 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

ANI notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Please see WP:ANI#User changing logos/information in articles to their personal thoughts/ideas/hopes. Magitroopa (talk) 17:00, 6 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Postmaster12,

Please come to ANI and respond to comments about your editing decision. And do not change content to out-of-date images, articles should display current logos unless, in the body of the article, a point is being made about earlier logos and how they have changed over the years. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:10, 6 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Until you discuss the edits, you do not have access to edit article. Star Mississippi 19:57, 6 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

June 2025

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing certain namespaces ((Article)) for abuse of editing privileges.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Star Mississippi 19:56, 6 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Proposal to use 1982 logo

I propose restoring the 1982 Microsoft logo on this article as it is a classic design and significant in the company’s brand history. It was used for over a decade and is often recognized in legacy materials and retro branding. If consensus agrees, this could also apply to related subbrands like Microsoft Gaming, unless there’s strong opposition. Example logo: File:Microsoft logo (1982).svg Please share your thoughts. Postmaster12 (talk) 21:20, 6 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

you should discuss your edits first: WP:ANI#User changing logos/information in articles to their personal thoughts/ideas/hopes. TheDutchArchivist (talk) 22:03, 6 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I discussed them already Postmaster12 (talk) 13:08, 11 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

June 2025

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 01:31, 7 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Given the course of events at the ANI thread along with your comment above it is clear you are either unable or unwilling to understand how Wikipedia works and what it is for. - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 01:32, 7 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock reason

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Postmaster12 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Your reason here Postmaster12 (talk) 19:03, 11 June 2025 (UTC)For now on im just gonna do a Logo history section i won't do it anymore change[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you:
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 23:26, 11 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

My reason

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Postmaster12 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Your reason here Postmaster12 (talk) 14:34, 12 June 2025 (UTC)I was blocked because of changing logos and previous awards to present just for a ceremony to have 2 awards and i won't do anymore disruption cause i realize things can't be overused or can't be the same as it was Postmaster12 (talk) 14:34, 12 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Please read through Wikipedia:Guide to appealing blocks and at least skim over the pages linked from Help:Getting started. That's going to be a bit of reading, but somewhere buried in that mess of links are probably some useful introductions to how Wikipedia works. Then perhaps read through Wikipedia:Competence is required and Wikipedia, our encyclopedia article about Wikipedia itself. It just doesn't seem like you understand what we're doing here and how our rules operate. Then try your best to write in comprehensible English, using proper grammar and punctuation. In an unblock request, you are trying to show us that you understand how Wikipedia's rules work and that you can be a constructive contributor. As it stands, it seems like you're not ready to edit Wikipedia yet. In case you're tempted to use an AI chatbot to write your unblock request for you, please don't. Those are typically rejected out of hand. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 10:23, 15 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Bushranger expanded the block, but as the admin who initially blocked them from article space, there's nothing here that shows me they have the competence to edit here. Star Mississippi 15:14, 12 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Propose to use kaleidoscope award

I propose to use the kaleidoscope award along with the KCA blimp for the Postmaster12 (talk) 14:42, 12 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Draft:CAM

If this was the first article that you created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, Draft:CAM, was deleted as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, or you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:29, 18 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Postmaster12 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Insert your reason to be unblocked here Postmaster12 (talk) 16:39, 15 July 2025 (UTC)I just understand what Wikipedia is only for and not ChatGPT[reply]

Decline reason:

This is not a route to being unblocked. Please take the time to read the materials Ninja linked above. For an unblock to be successful it might be helpful for you to indicate what edits you plan to make if unblocked especially if you're allowed access to article space. Star Mississippi 01:34, 16 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Postmaster12 (talk) 16:39, 15 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Postmaster12 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Your reason here Postmaster12 (talk) 21:30, 30 July 2025 (UTC)I read the guidelines and i know the fundamentals[reply]

Decline reason:

I will revoke talk page access. PhilKnight (talk) 04:51, 31 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Postmaster12 (talk) 21:30, 30 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked because an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.
Please note that there could be appeals to the Unblock Ticket Request System that have been declined leading to the posting of this notice.

PhilKnight (talk) 04:53, 31 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]