User talk:Pyrotec

This user may have left Wikipedia. Pyrotec has not edited Wikipedia since 6 June 2022. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else.

edit count | edit summary usage

Archives

07Q4 - 08Q1 - 8Q2 - 08Q3 - 08Q4 - 09Q1 - 09Q2 - 09Q3 - 09Q4 - 10Q1 - 10Q2 - 10Q3 - 10Q4 - 11Q1 - 11Q2 - 11Q3 - 11Q4 - 12Q1 - 12Q2 - 12Q3 - 12Q4 - 13Q1 - 13Q2 - 13Q3 - 13Q4 - 14Q1 - 14Q2 - 14Q3 - 14Q4 - 15Q1 - 15Q2 - 15Q3 - 19 - 20 - 21 - 22

This page has archives. Sections older than 28 days may be auto-archived by .

Good article reassessment for Suicide

Suicide has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Clovermoss🍀 (talk) 00:35, 15 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

CfD nomination at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2025 October 10 § Defunct/disused/former railway stations

Categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2025 October 10 § Defunct/disused/former railway stations on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 04:57, 10 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Good article reassessment for Carrière des Nerviens Regional Nature Reserve

Carrière des Nerviens Regional Nature Reserve has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 00:42, 14 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Good article reassessment for County Borough of Leeds

County Borough of Leeds has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 16:09, 22 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Good article reassessment for The Churchill Machine Tool Company

The Churchill Machine Tool Company has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 16:39, 22 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Good article reassessment for Plymouth

Plymouth has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 15:12, 30 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]