User talk:RovingPersonalityConstruct
Report
[edit]2 dudes are edit warring on the J-35 page. Thought that it may be of interest for you. KashanAbbas (talk) 10:23, 10 September 2025 (UTC)
'Operational History' section I began to add for the Type 055 destroyer.
[edit]Hello
I was wondering why you reverted my edit on the Type 055 destroyer page. Was it because it lacked source citation? If I cite sources for my inputs, would you allow the 'Operational History' section to stay?
Most every wikipedia page on military equipment have sections for 'Operational History', so I thought that the Type 055 should do as well.
--Definitelyfrank (talk) 09:32, 15 September 2025 (UTC)Definitelyfrank (talk) 09:06, 15 September 2025 (UTC)
- I did remove it because of the lack of verification. - RovingPersonalityConstruct (talk, contribs) 21:37, 15 September 2025 (UTC)
Evader at Paramount leader?
[edit]Guy that keeps editing the dates appears to have done it again. This the same guy? Admanny (talk) 23:57, 15 September 2025 (UTC)
- I suspect so. Good catch. - RovingPersonalityConstruct (talk, contribs) 00:17, 16 September 2025 (UTC)
Why you delete an edit without legitimate basis
[edit]Why did you delete my edit on HQ-9? If you googled, you could find ten more source. You could add them instead of deleting the whole edit and waste my time. But I can see from your edits that you are online-fighter rather an editor. Obsessed by your political views than Wikibiryalanmakinesi (talk) 23:06, 4 November 2025 (UTC)
- I did provide the rationale in my edit comment (see the links to the discussions of the sources your used on Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard.) I. general, please familiarize yourself with Wikipedia:Reliable sources. - RovingPersonalityConstruct (talk, contribs) 00:16, 5 November 2025 (UTC)
- I am familiar. You better stop editing based on your political agenda and seek the truth. People like you are everything wrong with this platform. Don't waste other editors time by baseless and ridiculous reasons. You and I both know why you deleted my edit. Wikibiryalanmakinesi (talk) 00:21, 5 November 2025 (UTC)
- I added another source and you deleted that one as well. This alone shows you don't care about the source but you have a content. How you are a confirmed editor? Wikibiryalanmakinesi (talk) 00:27, 5 November 2025 (UTC)
- I am familiar. You better stop editing based on your political agenda and seek the truth. People like you are everything wrong with this platform. Don't waste other editors time by baseless and ridiculous reasons. You and I both know why you deleted my edit. Wikibiryalanmakinesi (talk) 00:21, 5 November 2025 (UTC)
- Neither source is reliable, as previously discussed on RSN (linked to in my edit comments); you are required to provide reliable sources for your edits (WP:BURDEN.) You may also be interested in Wikipedia:Verifiability, not truth, given your earlier comment. - RovingPersonalityConstruct (talk, contribs) 00:30, 5 November 2025 (UTC)
- Both sources are reliable and you are taking absolute nonsense. Both sources are well known military sources and there are hundreds of sources reporting the news. There is a video of the missile system in Baki as well. I will report you. I am wondering how you are a confirmed editor while all you do is childish edit wars. I will ask my mentor to deal with you. You are definitely a huge waste of time for everyone one. Wikibiryalanmakinesi (talk) 00:37, 5 November 2025 (UTC)
- Neither source is reliable, as previously discussed on RSN (linked to in my edit comments); you are required to provide reliable sources for your edits (WP:BURDEN.) You may also be interested in Wikipedia:Verifiability, not truth, given your earlier comment. - RovingPersonalityConstruct (talk, contribs) 00:30, 5 November 2025 (UTC)
ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:35, 18 November 2025 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for December 4
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Congo (novel), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Carat.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:58, 4 December 2025 (UTC)