Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1st OpenFramework

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.‎

The result was delete. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 07:32, 5 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

1st OpenFramework

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I previously put a WP:PROD on this article with the rationale "No evidence that this software meets the notability criteria.". The Prod was removed by the article creator (whose account name resembles that of the developer given in the InfoBox) without comment or addressing the issues. I'm bringing this to AfD on the same rationale as the earlier Prod. AllyD (talk) 07:48, 29 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No referencing - only link is for downloading the prog, which could be regarded as somewhat of a spam link. No notability indicated. I feel the authou may not understand the difference between a directory and an encyclopaedia. Peridon (talk) 21:08, 29 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: I found no coverage to satisfy WP:GNG. Note, that similarly named openFrameworks is different, completely unrelated software. — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk) 21:23, 29 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:56, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:56, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

delete no content, no sources. Andy Dingley (talk) 18:00, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, not notable (33 downloads). MaNeMeBasat (talk) 11:49, 3 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - as above, no 3rd party references, no indication of notability; also, created by an SPA as possibly promotional. Dialectric (talk) 23:58, 3 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.