Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2012: Ice Age

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 21:11, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

2012: Ice Age

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I see blog-like reviews; streaming sites; and interference with Ice Age: Continental Drift, which was released in 2012; but no evidence of notability so far. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 19:11, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 19:11, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 19:11, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Keep Review at Blu-ray.com [[1]] Donaldd23 (talk) 02:17, 22 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jovanmilic97 (talk) 20:47, 28 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Keep Based on reviews of similar pages about movies also lacking lots of resources, I don’t see why this does not qualify to be retained.WikiSzeman (talk) 16:41, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Keep The three different reviews (including the Blu-Ray) are substantial enough to satisfy WP:NFILM -- Whiteguru (talk) 09:34, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 12:45, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

delete the keeps don't make any policy based arguments. There is 0 in depth coverage of this and the reviews are from fanblogs and other non rs save for the blue-ray one which is still questionable. GRINCHIDICAE🎄 00:52, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete has no coverage from any reliable media. I don't see how this meets GNG or any specialized notability category. The only 2 sources noted are primary. Tennis Anyone?^Talk 02:58, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No significant coverage, doe snot meet WP:GNG. Webmaster862 (talk) 03:23, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I could not find the kind of sourcing necessary to establish notability under either NFILM or GNG. Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 18:35, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.