Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AGB Investigative Services
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. slakr\ talk / 14:45, 18 February 2014 (UTC)
- AGB Investigative Services (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No evidence of notability per WP:GNG and WP:CORP. Sources are trivial and or primary and thus fail WP:RS. This sounds like WP:SPAM. Article was previously tagged PROD with various maintenance tags. All were removed w/o explanation or improvement. Ad Orientem (talk) 18:47, 2 February 2014 (UTC)
- Note Article's creator has left a message on the talk page. -Ad Orientem (talk) 18:51, 2 February 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Illinois-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:52, 4 February 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:52, 4 February 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Washington, D.C.-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:52, 4 February 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:52, 4 February 2014 (UTC)
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 01:38, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
- Delete Agree with nom that there aren't enough secondary sources to warrant notability in either guideline. Wieno (talk) 04:35, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.