Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AIMMS

This discussion was subject to a deletion review on 2009 September 11.
For an explanation of the process, see Wikipedia:Deletion review.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 06:22, 5 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AIMMS

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Old article, but appears to be mostly productspam. Zero independent references, and a quick google search didn't turn up much other than the documentation and our article. Also, most of the content is documentation and pitch. This just doesn't seem that significant.

Delete as nominator. /Blaxthos ( t / c ) 04:26, 23 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:51, 30 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:52, 30 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: I can't find significant coverage for this software. Joe Chill (talk) 16:06, 30 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Let me see, I count 14 external links, all going to the AIMMS site: there's spamming, then there's spamming your own Wikipedia page - how novel. I did do a search but I really can't be asked to trawl through any more of it, I cannot believe how many organisations are using that acronym. So it's probably notable if I bothered to research it properly (or if the authors put in some decent refs) but I !vote delete on the grounds that its a copyvio of its own website here and here. SpinningSpark 17:49, 30 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.