Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AI datacenter

AI datacenter

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contested WP:BLAR. Original reasoning was This is a rambling, borderline incoherent writing that jumps from topic to topic at random and is completely unfocused. Redirecting to the main data center page as I don't believe that AI Datacenters are notable by themselves even if properly written. Author has stated that it supposedly is a "work in progress" but I'm not sure how credible that claim is... it would take a huge amount of work to make what currently exists acceptable. Note that I am skipping the step of draftifying since I have a feeling the creator would just revert that as well. Taking Out The Trash (talk) 19:33, 9 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Artificial intelligence-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 19:34, 9 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the feedback. Article is work in progress. First step was to write down immediate notes. It is all focused on the topic of AI datacenter. There is much to write and there is much discussion in the news and internet on this topic, reaching all way to the whitehouse. I reviewed the process of draftifying. I think the article will get more edits where it is.

On the topic of notability: the article has 30+ references including links to whitehouse discussion and some of the most important companies in the world. I find the argument of lack of notability absurd.

Daniel.Cardenas (talk) 19:40, 9 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Update: Done editing for now. Thanks for the help. Daniel.Cardenas (talk) 00:37, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Technology and Computing. Wikishovel (talk) 19:48, 9 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Refs. 15 and 20 are enough to satisfy SIGCOV, and I think the topic is distinct enough from "data center" more generally to have an article (the sources seem to suggest AI datacenters are unique, and based on my limited knowledge I would agree). But the article right now is a hot mess, with much better sourcing needed and considerable copyediting for clarity and coherence. Frankly the article isn't ready for mainspace so I could accept draftify as my second choice. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 23:10, 9 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Draftify Sounds like it is a work in progress so let's keep it in draft space and have it go through the normal AfC process? I am skeptical this is a necessary content fork of "datacenter" since there isn't that much different when it comes to AI datacenters. From my view they have extreme size/power/volatile memory/parallelism requirements but in a certain sense that is just the expected result of exponential growth in computation. I vote draftify and we can see how it ends up after further editing to judge whether it is a necessary/unnecessary content fork. Anonrfjwhuikdzz (talk) 01:10, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Why sounds like? Have you bothered to look at the article? There are many differences outlined in the article. The 50 references and external links are unique for ai datacenters and are not generically talking about datacenter. Daniel.Cardenas (talk) 02:33, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

merge certainly data centre should include some information about AI datacentres, but not like this. Joe (talk) 11:30, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]