Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AdSparx

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.‎

The result was speedy delete. G11, entirely promotional and incapable of being rewritten. DGG ( talk ) 02:49, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

AdSparx

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article created by undisclosed paid COI editor in direct violation of the TOU. Article only edited by them and a (now) blocked sock. We either clean up this sort of mess or it carries on. Widefox; talk 16:44, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Widefox; talk 18:26, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Update: Article created Oct 2014 by User:BiH, paid editing disclosure made June 2015 [1] along with a long list of previously undisclosed paid articles: User_talk:BiH#Terms_of_Use Widefox; talk 02:04, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete for the sufficient reasons above, plus inherent notability problems with a pre-commercially viable "cloud-based in-stream video ad technology" startup. All the sources say is that it has received various types funding, nothing about what makes the company or its tech worth noting in an encyclopedia. WP is not a startup directory. - Brianhe (talk) 18:33, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.