Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alexis Simone

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.‎

The result was delete - fails WP:BIO. TerriersFan (talk) 17:45, 24 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Alexis Simone

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is an autobiography, and it's very self-promotional. There are no reliable sources (the only reference is to the subject's/author's web site). It lacks WP:Notability. Vanjagenije (talk) 22:07, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete agreed. No attempt to disguise its being an advertisement, and it even slips into second person at one point ("Check out this young entertainer..."). Sheesh. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 01:21, 18 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - because the fact that she "wears a majority of professional hats" (what does that even mean!?!) isn't a claim to notability and she obviously doesn't meet WP:GNG. Edit history confirms this was an attempt at an advertisement, then an autobiography. St★lwart¹¹¹ 03:14, 18 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. This could probably be speedied as spam, but it'd be worth going through a long enough period to get a snow delete to prevent further attempts at re-creation before GNG is met. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 05:03, 18 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: No evidence of attained notability. AllyD (talk) 05:51, 18 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:19, 18 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:19, 18 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:19, 18 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as per above.--Tomwsulcer (talk) 23:37, 18 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete It is time to remove all articles lacking sources.John Pack Lambert (talk) 20:55, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.