Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Antonio D'Amico

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.‎

The result was keep. Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 03:34, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Antonio D'Amico

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The references do not establish notability Barbara (WVS) ✐ ✉ 00:17, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. ^{Babymissfortune} 00:48, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. ^{Babymissfortune} 00:48, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. ^{Babymissfortune} 00:48, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions. ^{Babymissfortune} 00:49, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete there are lots of good sources out there, but they are all in the context of reporting on Versace. I think this article amounts to BLP1E: he was the boyfriend of a famous person. Notability is also not inherited.104.163.148.25 (talk) 01:31, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep or atleast merge with Versace, searching google news gives massive amounts of coverage. Probably the most i have seen for someone at a AFD. GuzzyG (talk) 07:27, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep this person seems very notable to the point that there are recent stories about him, this article needs to be expanded, not deleted. --Donald Trung (Talk) (Articles) 08:33, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Did you find any coverage on him that does not relate to the death of Versace?104.163.148.25 (talk) 21:38, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 17:59, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per above. Ethanbas ^(talk) 08:18, 24 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per above. Ricky Martin played him in the recent film -- how notable is that! Bearian (talk) 23:16, 24 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.