Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Asher Pike

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. v/r - T P 01:52, 15 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Asher Pike

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Hardly a notable character. Footnotes all lead to abc.com empty of content not germane to the subject. Wlmg (talk) 04:36, 7 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Not notable enough to be merged into List of All My Children characters. Also, I don't know and am not an expert of this character at all, and I have not watched soap operas ever since the early 2000s. The Wikipedians, the general media, the entertainment news industry, and others have not known or not been interested with this fictional character at all. Wikipedia is not a substitute for websites that dedicate to specific subjects, such as soap operas. Any soap opera expert should know this character, especially after the show was pulled away from television; unfortunately, the article's lack of improvement and absence of realistic perspective may indicate lack of interests from soap dedicators. --Gh87 (talk) 05:50, 7 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:58, 7 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:58, 7 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as lacking in-depth coverage in independent third party sources. I've marked 3 of 4 links as link dead. Stuartyeates (talk) 08:59, 14 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Merge - non-notable soap opera character. Should be merged to the List of All My Children characters page. --Madison-chan (talk) 23:55, 14 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.