Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AutoScheme

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.‎

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 03:16, 5 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

AutoScheme

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contested PROD. Reason was "Unreleased software with no indication of notability. (The website for the software is "under construction", and I get a blank page when trying to access the developer.) No other links provided. Obviously too soon for an article." Despite creating editor protestations on article talk page, the development website says "AutoScheme.com is currently under construction." Press coverage is press release style, dating back to January and February 2013 and stating "Coming soon", which it has not, so far. Fiddle Faddle 08:25, 17 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Too soon. The article now linked is a press release style thing. (The company site is now accessible, but the software site is 'under construction'.) I can see possible future notability for this software, as seeing kitchen units in a showroom is very different from seeing the layout in your own kitchen area. However, this will only come with time, and while I wish them good luck, they really need to have the product released and being independently covered before trying again here. Note to the author: saying that something is "an IFC based 3D space planning software designed for use with the BIM protocols" tells most of us nothing. 'Space planning' could cover anything from NASA designing a lunar module to someone designing a back yard play area. Peridon (talk) 09:07, 17 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:25, 18 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Crisco 1492 (talk) 00:01, 26 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete This CAD software for designing kitchens has not been released yet and there are no independent reliable sources that I could find that discuss it in depth. With no RS, this fails WP:GNG notability guidelines. There is no prejudice to recreation if multiple independent reliable sources become available. --Mark viking (talk) 00:46, 26 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Too soon, as per nom. Deathlibrarian (talk) 02:24, 26 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No evidence of attained notability. AllyD (talk) 06:13, 26 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Per nomination. MrScorch6200 (talk) 16:38, 26 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Per nomination. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ginosti (talk • contribs) 10:35, 27 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.