Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bad Intention

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedied CSD:G7. Clearly not a viable article, and AfD'd by its own author, no point in letting this one run. Black Kite 12:04, 4 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Bad Intention

Delete this article.
It doesn't have notability. Thebluesharpdude (talk) 01:42, 4 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You didn't need to open an AfD when there was already a PROD on the article. I've removed the prod now that this AfD is open, since I assume that you meant to contest the PROD. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 01:44, 4 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Complete gibberish. Wouldn't this qualify as a speedy delete? Renee (talk) 02:02, 4 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete In my opinion, at best it's WP:OR. No references that this term is comonly used this way.--Cube lurker (talk) 02:14, 4 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Pretty much WP:OR. You could've placed {{db-author}} on the page and saved the trouble. Precious Roy (talk) 02:25, 4 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.