Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Behavioral Geovector

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 01:18, 30 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Behavioral Geovector

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Covert ad for something called Percipio Orange Mike | Talk 01:07, 18 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep We must distinguish 4 problems before trashing all of it...
The subjet of it (as Wikipedia would like it): It is said '...a process which involves defining the position of a person and capturing the direction of their eye movement' (and I would add 'and the applications of it.'); there is now enough examples (iPhone, etc.) to establish an interest for that field.
The title of it: Difficult question I must say, There are several options but none seems 'OK':
- Spatial augmented reality (SAR)? Unfortunately the definition says otherwise...
- Augmented reality? It is part of it but is too general.
- Geovector? NO, it's the name of one of the companies in that field.
- Pointing? Proposed term of that company, but seems to me too 'mousy'...
- Directional geolocation?
- Geoaugmented reality?
- I don't know: it could be Behavioral geolocation...
The definition/content of the article: keep what's salvageable...
The commercial aspect: let's isolate it to a last section with appropriate external links.
Although I have no commercial interest in this, I must say I participated as a programmer on a prototype for the Canadien Army in the '90s, so I thing I know more than most on the subject... --AlainR345^{Techno-Wiki-Geek} 20:04, 21 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I found nothing in gnews, gscholar and gbooks for this. LibStar (talk) 05:35, 24 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, T. Canens (talk) 02:30, 26 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Were this anything other than a non-notable neologism and coatrack spam, I'd have expected Google News, Books, or Scholar to have heard of it. They haven't. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 20:58, 26 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.