Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Beliamen

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 11:02, 23 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Beliamen

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unreferenced for nearly twenty years, I haven't been able to verify that this place exists. Happy to be corrected. – Joe (talk) 10:00, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Geography and Pakistan. – Joe (talk) 10:00, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No significant coverage, not even one, does not meet WP:GNG. Dcotos (talk) 12:24, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Fails to meet WP:NGEO, the place doesn't actually exist. M.Ashraf333 (talk) 17:27, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I couldn't find any coverage—let alone mentions—of this place, other than in entries on Wikipedia mirror sites. Definitely fails WP:NLAND. That Tired Tarantula^Burrow 18:41, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Not seeing anything. Timur9008 (talk) 19:48, January 22, 2024 (UTC)
Strong Delete: a quick google search turned up no results. As stated before, this article doesn't meet WP:GNG. ''Flux55'' (talk) 02:53, 23 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.