Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bester Kalombo

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. There's no indication of sourcing the pivotal claim of refereeing at the olympics, so I consider this basically unanimous.Chaser - T 20:08, 15 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Bester Kalombo

Prodded by User:Indrian with reasoning "Importance of subject not established". This might not be the case, so I'm bringing it to AFD instead. Punkmorten 12:59, 8 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, if and only if, it can be sourced that he refereed at the Olympic Games. - fchd 08:59, 9 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, per fchd user:KRBN 12:12, 9 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Weak delete - a few group matches in an Olympic Games isn't really that notable. Doesn't satisfy multiple non-trivial works crtierion for notability in WP:N as far as I can see. Qwghlm 09:56, 11 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Looking briefly at the article List of football referees, and then having a glance through a number of the referees listed, many of them seem to have articles about them for refereeing at matches in the World Cup, rather than for an Olympic Games. I'm not really sure whether this should be deleted or kept. Looking at the article it seems that because he was a referee at one Olympic Games he has an article. Is that reason enough to be notable? If so then fine. ♦Tangerines BFC ♦·Talk 12:04, 11 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Doesn't meet WP:N or WP:BIO and I see no particular case for notability.--Kubigula (talk) 22:07, 14 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete WP:BIO - the Olympic football tournament is a minor event, both in terms of the Games and football. Couldn't find any non-trivial coverage of him (he also ran for the Malawi FA presidency and was the Director of Sports in the Malawi Ministry of Sports). --Ytny (talk) 17:51, 15 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.