Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Boue souers

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Userfied to User:Ellen Ada Goldberg/Boué Soeurs until the copyright issue is resolved. NawlinWiki (talk) 20:47, 23 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Boue souers

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I'm finding it very hard to establish the subject of the article, as it's so poorly structured and a lot of it is written in bad French, but as far as notability is concerned, after a quick google search, I was unable to find any significant, secondary source coverage. Jay _{Σεβαστός}^discuss 23:07, 19 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I have contacted User:Haabet who might be able to help with notability. Richiez (talk) 00:16, 20 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I do not know Boue souers. I think as some Franch will be able to cut the text down to understandable English.Haabet 11:34, 20 March 2011 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 20:18, 20 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 20:18, 20 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep and correct the spelling of the title. Searching under the right spelling finds plenty of news and book sources showing that this was a notable fashion house: Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL. Phil Bridger (talk) 16:53, 21 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Phil Bridger. Ample RS coverage is available for Boué Soeurs, the correct name. • Gene93k (talk) 14:38, 23 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Note: Title has been corrected to Boué Soeurs at request of article's creator. Station1 (talk) 19:42, 23 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Speedy delete without prejudice towards recreation but there is nothing worth keeping here, copyright violation as indicated in the first paragraph RadioFan (talk) 20:00, 23 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.